• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    …it’s a monarchy.

    If anyone you read, or know, ever refers to a monarchy as progressive, you can immediately disregard everything they ever write, or say.

    The only context where it’s at least explainable would be in a limited to direct comparison between Jordan and the other regional monarchs with large petroleum reserves.

    • Dept@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      it’s also a tribal country. Pretty much all Jordanians belong to different tribes and they still have all that honor stuff.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sweden is technically a monarchy but a constitutional one. Jordan is actually a traditional monarchy, just weakly pretending to be a constitutional one.