• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18 days ago

      I can see how it’s an easy fix but IMO it’s a waste of energy and resources to pack up all dependencies for every app.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 days ago

        Flatpak is inefficient, but very convenient. The impact of “package once, use anywhere” is huge.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        88 days ago

        It depends on what your metrics are for energy and resources. Are you talking about the end user hardware, or are you talking about developer time and effort. If it’s the former, you’re right, if it’s the latter you’re completely wrong. And while there’s merit to your point (if it is about end user storage, energy consumption, etc), that’s not really in short supply while open source developers free time is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          08 days ago

          developer time and effort has to increase 100 fold to even touch the energy waste larger downloads create.

          How much more efficient do you recon the developers are because of flatpack? Does it quantify against the bandwidth and storage needs?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            78 days ago

            Where I live, most electricity is hydroelectric, nuclear, or wind. So it’s really NBD to download a few extra MBs of data, especially since flatpaks aren’t something you need to download over and over again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 days ago

    Thats awsome a standardised system for applications and display with Wayland. This might finally be the year of the linux desktop.