• bufalo1973
    link
    fedilink
    62
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Donates or “donates”? As “all yours” or as in “it’s ours but you do the work”?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      As in
      “We’ve finished taking all we need from the Mono project and implemented it into our proprietary .NET implementation for Linux, Android and iOS. Instead of getting flack for killing off Mono (which is open source and would’ve been forked anyways) we graciously give this old husk to the Wine project. We recommend that active Mono users and maintainers of Mono-based app frameworks migrate to .NET. kthnxbye!”

      Good thing that it went to Wine I guess, as they do lots of work to get old Windows programs up and running in Linux and that often involves Mono.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            420 days ago

            It is not “.NET Core” anymore though. Since version 5, it has just been “.NET”. The current version is 8 with previews of 9 available.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -321 days ago

          Oh what’s that? Some rational thought in my ramblings? Nah we can’t have that in this sublemmy champ

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1821 days ago

        Good thing that it went to Wine I guess, as they do lots of work to get old Windows programs up and running in Linux and that often involves Mono.

        I see this as the main purpose of this transfer of ownership. When it comes to developing new software, MS has their modern tech stack for creating cross-compatible code, and the recommendation is to use that. But that is not helpful when trying to get old legacy software running on a modern system. So MS is giving this “outdated” technology to the WINE team. A team whose primary goal is getting incompatible software to run in the “wrong” environment. This should allow WINE to continue to properly handle older Mono software for the foreseeable future.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        620 days ago

        You are completely correct. The good news is that the “official” .NET is Open Source now and far better than the “Mono Project” ever was.

  • finley
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3921 days ago

    And that’s how you know it’s worthless

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3421 days ago

    Okay, a suspicious thanks to you, Microsoft…

    …So when can we get this treatment for WMR so all our VR headsets don’t become useless bricks kthaaaanks!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Not much. There used to be this fear of Microsoft copyrighting Mono for reimplementing their stuff on Linux. For that reason, Mono was avoided by linux app developers. But since MS had acquired the company that made and developed Mono and they have also open-sourced .NET and everything, this does not mean much.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
        link
        fedilink
        -521 days ago

        For that reason, Mono was avoided by linux app developers. But since MS had acquired the company that made and developed Mono

        “You don’t like it? Fine then, we buy it and force it on you!”

        Classic Microshit.

      • melroy
        link
        fedilink
        221 days ago

        Yea I know. But I still can’t believe it.

        Microsoft finally sees they can’t code.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          720 days ago

          No.

          Microsoft maintains what is essentially the “real” version of Mono within their official .NET project. It is up to version 8.

          The version of Mono represents by “The Mono Project” still targets .NET Framework ( stuck on version 4.x for years now ). Microsoft does not care about the real version, nevermind the Open Source replica.

          What Microsoft is “donating” is pure legacy. It is a good fit for Wine though.