• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, it’s trained on internet content, and there’s probably a lot of articles that say “Google” and “monopoly” in close proximity.

  • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    -a matter of legal and economic interpretation

    If there’s a possible interpretation that a company is a monopoly, they’re a monopoly.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree on the merits, but the contrarian in me has to point out that any company is a monopoly through some convoluted interpretation. For example: Logitech has a monopoly on mice and keyboards that work with their proprietary software.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait until AGI!

    AGI: Yes.

    Wait until the sentient robots!

    Sentient robots: Yes.

    Wait until biological…

    Biologics: Glub, glub. Yes.

  • HStone32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    “If you’re here about the health advisory that aired on channel six recently, say ‘silly ol’ advisory.'”

  • BF2040@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Other search engines use Google for their results. There are very few independent web crawlers.