If granted it would fulfil repeated requests by Ukraine for restrictions on such weapons to be lifted.
  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
    432·
    3 months ago

    Shut up and do it ya morally defunct crumpet.

    Also, maybe divert shipments from Israel to Ukraine.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    11·
    3 months ago

    I think that the doctrine should be "anything Russia does or uses is allowed. Simple.

    • Maalus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      3 months ago

      Shoulda coulda. What should have happened is NATO busting the door to Russia the second they crossed the border. In reality, Ukraine is in a weaker position geopolitically. They are clawing their way up the totem pole though. Same reason why WW2 ended on such shitty terms for everyone in central Europe - Russians were in a stronger geopolitical position and could dictate what they wanted. The one that wants peace will always back down from using force. The one who wins is the one not afraid of war or its continuation.

  • vaultdweller013English
    73·
    3 months ago

    We should let them rocket bomb Moscow, itd be funny. Also if ya fuck up Moscows rails ya can severely hurt Russian logistics.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      3 months ago

      So many targets that are way more impactful than civilians. Russias economy is one of raw materials. Processing them is done by very large vulnerable manufacturing plants.

      Railways are easy to repair. It’s done in hours.

      • vaultdweller013English
        21·
        3 months ago

        The psychological impact of Moscow being bombed would help fuck with the Russians. Plus there are plenty of military assets in Moscow still even ignoring rails.