My testing setup is, all on the same subnet, ipv4

  • Windows Machine with Intel x520
    • Direct Connect 10Gbps cable
  • USW Aggregation switch (10Gbps)
    • Direct Connect 10Gbps cable
  • Synology NAS with Intel x520
    • SRVIO Connection
  • Debian VM
iperf3 Windows To Debian: 6Gbits/sec
.\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.11.57  --get-server-output
Connecting to host 192.168.11.57, port 5201
[  5] local 192.168.11.132 port 56855 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.01   sec   817 MBytes  6.79 Gbits/sec
[  5]   1.01-2.00   sec   806 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.01   sec   822 MBytes  6.85 Gbits/sec
[  5]   3.01-4.00   sec   805 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.01   sec   818 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   5.01-6.00   sec   806 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.01   sec   821 MBytes  6.83 Gbits/sec
[  5]   7.01-8.00   sec   805 MBytes  6.80 Gbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.01   sec   820 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   9.01-10.00  sec   809 MBytes  6.84 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  7.94 GBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec                  sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  7.94 GBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec                  receiver

Server output:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #9)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.11.132, port 56854
[  5] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56855
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   806 MBytes  6.76 Gbits/sec
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   816 MBytes  6.85 Gbits/sec
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   812 MBytes  6.81 Gbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   815 MBytes  6.84 Gbits/sec
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   811 MBytes  6.80 Gbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   814 MBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   815 MBytes  6.84 Gbits/sec
[  5]  10.00-10.00  sec  1.12 MBytes  4.81 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  7.94 GBytes  6.82 Gbits/sec                  receiver


iperf Done.
iperf3 debian to windows 9.5Gbits/sec
.\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.11.57  --get-server-output -R
Connecting to host 192.168.11.57, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.11.57 is sending
[  5] local 192.168.11.132 port 56845 connected to 192.168.11.57 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.40 Gbits/sec
[  5]   1.01-2.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   3.01-4.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   5.01-6.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   7.01-8.00   sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.01   sec  1.11 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
[  5]   9.01-10.00  sec  1.09 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.0 GBytes  9.46 Gbits/sec    0             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.0 GBytes  9.46 Gbits/sec                  receiver

Server output:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #7)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.11.132, port 56844
[  5] local 192.168.11.57 port 5201 connected to 192.168.11.132 port 56845
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.42 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.10 GBytes  9.47 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
[  5]  10.00-10.00  sec  2.50 MBytes  7.72 Gbits/sec    0   2.01 MBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.0 GBytes  9.46 Gbits/sec    0             sender


iperf Done.

I find that rather curious, something in the windows 10 tcp settings that limit the outgoing throughput, window size maybe?

Debian MTU
ip link show ens3 | grep -i "mtu"
2: ens3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
Windows MTU
netsh interface ipv4 show subinterfaces

   MTU  MediaSenseState   Bytes In  Bytes Out  Interface
------  ---------------  ---------  ---------  -------------
  1500                1  273580016987  64376522487  Ethernet 4
    • jet@hackertalks.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, the photo is of a general computer. So most of the cooling is for the CPU and GPU.

      SFP modules can get quite hot, especially if they’re pushing high frequencies over copper. So you’ll see some people complaining about their 10 gigabit copper SFP modules overheating. Especially on passively cooled network equipment.

      Fiber optics don’t get nearly as hot, and don’t have overheating issues. Direct connect cables also do not get hot.

      I’d much rather have all of my networking equipment with fiber optics, then copper. The trade-off is it’s harder to splice your own fiber optic cable and put termination on it, the benefit is the equipment is much much cheaper, More reliable, cooler, goes further distance… A fiber optic SFP module cost about $10 for one, but a copper SFP module is like $100.

      • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Thanks for the clarification ! It wasn’t clear to me what I was looking at first sight. I fought that was some self-hosted/DIY 10Gbs router/switch. Sorry if my question came the wrong way or was a stupid one. I’m just a curious guy !

        Thanks for the additional information !!