Summary

Special counsel Jack Smith dropped 44 federal charges against Donald Trump, citing DOJ policy that sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted.

The charges, including election interference and classified documents retention, could be refiled after Trump’s presidency.

Critics, including Rep. Dan Goldman and former Capitol officer Aquilino Gonell, decried the move as a miscarriage of justice, asserting it places Trump above the law.

Trump and allies celebrated the decision as a victory, with Vice President-elect JD Vance vowing to prevent similar prosecutions.

Democrats fear Trump will seek political retaliation, deepening national divisions.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    If only we still had another month with a Dem president and his AG controlling the DOJ…

    I mean a month is a short time, ideally we’d have had that the last four fucking years and had plenty of time to handle this.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Fairly certain and it appears obvious the DOJ believes the president is totally immune.

      Part of the reason we are not members of the ICC.

      Part of the reason Dick Cheney is not in The Hague right now.

      Fairly certain United States has been a fascist country since at least 1790

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        5 days ago

        I wouldn’t go that far back, or say we’ve been a fascist country for that long.

        I put a lot of blame on Dems closing ranks for Bill back in the 90s.

        The root of the argument is semantic: The President has testified that he did not touch Lewinsky sexually. Lewinsky’s testimony, and that of her friends and colleagues claim he did.

        But the bottom line is whether this constitutes an impeachable offense. Again, Starr’s report claims there is ample evidence of Clinton lying under oath, and concealing evidence of his relationship with Lewinsky to begin impeachment proceedings. Lawyers for Clinton declared today that the President’s transgressions were “personal,” but do not constitute an impeachable offense.

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-clinton-lie-under-oath/

        Like, people still act like trump has some mastermind legal strategy when he’s just ripping off Bill by blurring the line between president and person.

        At the end of the day for decades both parties have agreed that regardless of which one of them is in charge, no one gets any consequences from the others.

        We can’t count on those groups holding each other accountable. Voters need to hold at least one party to a higher standard, or literally no one is ever going to be held accountable.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Pretty sure y’all just lost the election spectacularly, so might as well hold the party accountable now that the worst has already happened.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              They already think it’s cause they didn’t go far right enough. They’ve got their heads up their asses as always and won’t change as always.

              • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Yeah right? Might as well use these next 4 years, organize and rally behind a real third party no? No?

                Oh y’all voting democrats again In 4 years? Blue no matter who?

                Yeah that’s what I thought

                • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Which third party has any seats in any state legislature? Which one has anyone in Congress or a governorship?

                  None of that will change in four years. If I quit my job and start right fucking now doing organizing - even though I don’t know what that entails other than dealing with people which I loathe - it will be a solid decade before any third party has any chance of controlling anything outside of a city council.

                  • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Maybe with that attitude. Bernie’s movement rose from people hating the word socialist to everyone freaking out one might become President in less than a year. The Bolsheviks went from 20,000 at the beginning of the year to more than 200,000 and taking over Russia by the October Revolution. Things can change quickly if people put in the effort. Things are already primed. People are looking for a change now.

                    If people want to look into local chapters of organizations, there’s the PSL (socialist), the FRSO (socialist), and the Greens (progressive). Working within the Democratic party is the WFP and DSA. I think it’s a bad idea, but there’s a faction in the DSA looking to separate from them more, maybe there is in the WFP, too, idk. There’s also even more local based organizations that focus on other issues but can be pulled into a political fight later, like tenants unions, Food Not Bombs, labor unions, the Tech Workers Coalition, things like that. Hopefully we can connect these struggles together at some point and make something viable.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            For an honest attempt at it?

            No, it’ll never be a fair fight.

            But if we want a Dem primary in 2028, we need to keep demanding it, and we need to solidify around a candidate ASAP.

            Voters beat the party in 08, and they’ve had to walk back a lot of what Hillary changed in 2016 to prevent that.

            I still feel crazy that everyone ignored what happened to NH this “primary” but I don’t think we’re really at the point where Dems just appoint candidates without a primary.

            We just need a candidate that refuses to concede until more than a handful of chosen states vote.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                Certainly the game is rigged. Don’t let that stop you; if you don’t bet you can’t win.

                As true today as in 1987 when Heinlein wrote it

                  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    With all due respect then, stop playing.

                    Don’t stick around to talk about how you no longer care, go spend your time on communities about different things.

                    Sometimes people need to disengage, just don’t half ass it. If you need a break from it, actually take a break. Hopefully you come back before the next election. But if you just talk about needing a break and never take one, you’ll never stop needing the break.

    • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      How about 2.5 years in which everyone held off because they didn’t want to step on the FBI’s toes, and it turned out that they weren’t doing anything?

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is just like Obama giving Bush and Cheney a pass for war crimes and starting a war based on complete lies.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yep. None of this is new, it’s the same song and dance.

        I’ve criticized both parties for acting like voters have the memory of goldfish, but it’s getting harder and harder to argue they’re wrong.

        People don’t remember the shit they literally lived thru already.

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      You’re talking about a criminal case, what does a month do for you? At every turn, Trump has consistently tried to delay the process. It has nothing to do with the DOJ or AG, they are working the system to intentionally delay everything until now. Why proceed either, he’s going to be president in two months.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        He’s making a facetious point about the huge quantities of time Merrick Garland had to waste to create this outcome.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        “they are working the system to intentionally delay everything until now.”

        If only every criminal defendant could afford to do the same…

        –It would probably be a moot point because it would be legislated away as a legal strategy by the same officials that were previously dragging their feet for Trump.