• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    They released a game that still needed 8 years of development…

      • AngryMob@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes obviously. One is completely transparent about being incomplete, often discounted. The other is deceitful and lying about incomplete and charging you full price.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh, I thought they issued refunds to those that wanted it. Seems they should have just labeled it differently at launch.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes. An early access is meant not to be a release version so everyone can wait for a 1.0 release if they want. NMS released as a 1.0 release, except that it was more of an overpromised 0.1 release. Sean Murray straight up lied to people about the game.

        Games like Project Zomboid, which I play & follow for almost 14 years now, have never claimed to be finished during all their time, or promised features that weren’t there.

        Guess which title I still regret buying? I hope they really learned their lesson with this one and don’t make the same mistake with their other title. Otherwise Murray will become the next Molyneux. Or worse, I hope they don’t learned that they can release a purposefully incomplete game by withholding features and content, adding simple easy to fix bugs, just to add & fix all that over the following months & years to be seen as game dev heroes. That’d be a terrifying new business model.