• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I know right. I used to be a kid who bypassed school firewalls and restrictions all the time. This is going to make no difference.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      By virtue of you actually knowing what a firewall is, and participating in the conversation, on this platform, you are ahead of 99 out of 100 people.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        True, but I was that one kid who showed all of my friends how to use a VPN to bypass all the restrictions as well, and then they taught their friends.

      • merde alors
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        “freedom” of kids and teenagers to rot their immature brains on “social media”?

        freedom to be manipulated by Zuckerberg and his minions?

        freedom to learn what a “real man” is from sexist assholes

        freedom to develop bottomless insecurities before constructing a semblance of a “self” to get you through the grit of societies

        at least they recognize the problem and … pass hopeless laws 🤷

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Freedom to raise your kids, and freedom to live your life as you choose, yes. Laws aren’t needed for this. Content management should come from parents, and if websites are pushing agendas or misinformation you don’t want your child on, you should be dictating what they are viewing.

          You don’t (lawfully) ban kids from parts of the library because you are worried they might read about things you don’t like, you monitor which books they are reading and tell them not to read such, or discuss why/why not those resources do not agree with or match the principles you agree with.

          This is the equivalent of banning kids talking to each other at school, on the bus or at the mall/park. If a platform is pushing harmful information then block that site, or bring a suit against the site for pushing harmful information.

          Edit: If you don’t want your kid on certain apps or sites you can start with things like this: https://families.google/familylink/ Don’t force it on other people with laws, I believe parents should have the choice for themselves. Apps like that allow you to block social media sites, restrict their app usage and reset passwords if needed.

          • merde alors
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            You don’t (lawfully) ban kids from parts of the library because you are worried they might read about things you don’t like, y…

            libraries are carefully curated. Popular “social media” of today is a shit show.

            This is the equivalent of banning kids talking to each other at school, on the bus or at the mall/park.

            no, it’s not “equivalent” to that at all. Are they banning messengers?

            Kids in schools talk through game chat anyways. Are they banning games in Australia?

            ☞ “Exemptions will apply for health and education services including YouTube, Messenger Kids, WhatsApp, Kids Helpline and Google Classroom.”

            this ban is not directed at kids, it’s targeting “big tech”.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              So instead of demanding big tech companies monitor their broadcasts, they are banning kids from accessing them, how is that not directed at kids? It is explicitly directed at kids.

              • merde alors
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                it’s illegal to sell alcohol to kids, right? Would you consider that too as “banning kids from accessing them”?