Protecting Trump’s enemies from prosecution just reinforces the idea of politics as retribution. Instead, Democrats should be defending his most vulnerable targets.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Also he should commute all federal death row inmates to life. The one thing that people don’t remember or realize is just how incredibly bloodthirsty Trump was in executing federal inmates. He did it in his last year because, if I am not mistaken, he had an issue procuring the necessary chemicals for the lethal injections.

    Trump executed more people in his one term than any other president in the 20th century save for FDR, and FDR was a 4-term president (technically 3 since he died shortly into his 4th term) and a very large portion of those were Nazi saboteurs (Many of whom were also American citizens, so they were guilty of treason). In total FDR had 16 people executed. George W. Bush, for all his bloodlust in Iraq and elsewhere, executed only 3 people, 1 of whom was Timothy McVeigh.

    Trump, in the span of only 6 months, had 13 people executed. This is unprecedented. Trump talks about being an old school ‘strong’ president who was free of political correctness and wokeness, yet even someone from the 1920s would have found his actions to be disturbing.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Should probably pardon everyone convicted of taking money under the table and smoking crack as well, but that would require a consistent moral character. I wouldn’t hold my breath. He doesn’t give a fuck anymore.

    • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      People still don’t understand Democrat Establishment is also on Team Corporations. They serve as the foil to Republicans, but only as entertainment to the masses. If they were a real party, they would have fielded a better candidate against Trump in 2016 and 2024. Bernie, for instance, could have easily mopped the floor with Trump, and greatly undermined his populist support, but that’s not what Capitalism and corporations want.

      Class warfare is happening and everyday Joe has been losing for decades. It’s no wonder The Adjuster did what he did.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          He should send SEAL team 6 to the houses of the justices that struck it down and make it clear that they will reverse their decisions or they and their entire families will be shot dead. Israel, Trump’s darling, routinely murders every single relative of people they don’t like. When they killed Hamas’s political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, they also killed 60 (you heard that right, 60!) of his relatives.

          They made their bed, now they need to sleep in it.

          • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Do you remember those “That was Easy!” buttons that proliferated about … 20 years ago. (Yikes.)

            In this flight of fancy, Biden has one of those placed on the Resolute desk and custom records audio for it, then goes on a wild spree of political edicts fulfilling everyone’s wildest dreams.

            Forgiving all student loan debt. Done. Pardoning illegal immigrants. Done. Amnesty for everyone currently seeking asylum. Done. Full citizenship for DREAMers. Done. Removing the post office retirement Fund requirement. Done. Legalize Weed? Done. Nuke the whales? Believe it or not, done.
            And after the scrawling of pen across paper has completed, the caps clicked safely back into place, another sound: cheap plastic clacking together, and Nixon’s disembodied voice emanating from the Easy Button’s tinny speaker “when the President does it, that means that it is not illegal!”

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            This has never been how “official act” immunity has worked and people need to stop acting like it was

            • gravitas_deficiency
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              People like you need to stop pretending this isn’t exactly how it works at the end of the day, once you include the power of presidential pardon.

              • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                No, it’s still not.

                Immunity doesn’t grant you new powers that the office never had before. It just lets you abuse the ones it already had. Please learn how things work before making haughty dumbass statements like you just did.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Like what?

      The only actions that I can think of that Trump couldn’t immediately undo are related to pardons, seating judges, or funding allies. Any other actions that Biden could take through Executive Order would be reversible, no?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Any other actions that Biden could take through Executive Order would be reversible, no?

        Then make trump do it. Make a bunch of popular executive orders. Let trump be the bad guy.

        Oh wait. That’s not pardoning a cokehead or supplying a genocide, which are the only things he’s willing to do, and you’ll forgive the former because he’s doing the latter.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I forgive the former because he’s already outlived two children and I wouldn’t trust them not to just go full kangaroo court.

          Edit: I absolutely do not excuse the latter

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’d be a lot more likely to forgive the former if he hadn’t been so fucking dedicated to norms when it could have mattered for people not named Hunter or Bibi.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Bidens son was definitely used for political reasons. He had a plea deal and the GOP didn’t want that so for it thrown out.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Bidens son was definitely used for political reasons.

            I don’t care if he was. If Biden can ignore norms and his own word to pardon Hunter, he could have ignored norms at any point during his presidency on behalf of people who aren’t as connected as his junkie progeny. He chose not to.

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Biden used wrist-slap!

    It hurt itself in its confusion!

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem is that pardoning undocumented immigrants won’t have any real effect. Yes, crossing the border illegally is a crime, but is the equivalent of a misdemeanor; in other circumstances, it would likely result in a fine and no jail time. But even if they’re all pardoned, that doesn’t give them legal status in the US. There’s likely not a lot that Biden can do to give them the status that they would need. And even if he could, there wouldn’t be much to stop Trump from revoking it.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eh, do it anyway and force them to waste time arguing in court about it. Obstruct them like they do us.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here’s a straightforward thing the Biden administration could do without Congress to protect migrants

      In the period between now and Inauguration Day, on January 20th, the Biden Administration could still give immigrants additional layers of protection before Trump takes office. One of the most obvious possibilities is to expand T.P.S. for Nicaraguans [and other migrants]… So far, however, the Administration appears unwilling to do so, just as it remains opposed to renewing parole for those who entered through Biden’s “pathways.” Trump almost certainly will revoke parole. Either way, the senior congressional staffer told me, “parole is a weak protection compared to T.P.S.”

      When Trump tried to end T.P.S. for certain nationalities in his first term, federal courts blocked him on the grounds that he had a “predetermined presidential agenda” that betrayed a racial “animus.” According to a former Biden Administration official with knowledge of current talks, the State Department supports expanding T.P.S. for Nicaraguans, based on a straightforward analysis of what’s happening in the country, but Mayorkas, at D.H.S., is opposed. (A D.H.S. spokesperson said that this was false and that “no decision has been made.”) “Extending T.P.S. used to be one of the easiest things Democrats supported,” the senior congressional staffer told me. But the Administration’s approach is now constrained by anxieties that it might seem brash or opportunistic on its way out. “It’s becoming evident that they believe immigration was one of the main factors in the electoral defeat,” the staffer said. “They don’t want to take actions that would double down on what they believe is a failed political strategy.”

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lmao, they think taking the Republican line loudly and proudly failed so they’re refusing to to double down by taking the democratic line from a decade ago? I’m not saying I don’t believe the staffer, the Save America Pod interview made it clear they’re completely detached from reality, it’s just hilarious to me.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        But we’re talking about ILLEGAL MIGRANTS… are you morphing the two together?

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          We’re talking about the same people, Biden could and should extend TPS protections to all of them to clear up any bullshit immigration officials are trying to pull

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed, it won’t stop the radical right GQPers from doing their evils. Plus it will alienate more people on the immigration issue - what the USA needs is real solutions and people would see this for what it would be, political gamesmanship.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        What evils? There are no evils. Republicans simply do not support ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION… jesus, this is becoming worse than r/politics that swings so hard left, it’s nuts…

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Last time Trump separated families, do you think this time they’ll play nice? But sure, keep you head in the sand.

          • ZK686@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            And Obama, Clinton, Biden… didn’t do anything right? I mean, their hands are clean right? It’s ONLY Trump that’s trying to fix out immigration system? You don’t get to choose who’s had moral high ground with this issue. All Presidents have had to deal with it differently, some are just better at hiding their tactics.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Plus it will alienate more people on the immigration issue

        Immigration was the 2nd most important issue to voters, after direct economic issues (e.g., how well they felt they were doing economically). Without seeing what mass deportations will actually do to the economy and country as a whole, the majority of people that voted this year are in favor of the shit the GOP has promised to do.

        the USA needs is real solutions

        There isn’t one, not really. Certainly nothing that can be done in a mere four years, and probably not in sixteen. The countries that people are coming from are largely desperately poor, and struggling with gang violence. The way to ‘solve’ the immigration issue is to correct the problems in their own countries so that they don’t feel like making the journey to the US is a necessary for their survival. We can have some degree of effect on the gang violence by cutting the demand for the drugs in the US that fuel the gang violence in central and south American countries. But we can’t do much of anything directly. We can dump money into the issue, but then you have the problem of people in the US screaming about how we should be helping people in the US before doing any kind of foreign aid (spoiler: we wouldn’t be helping people in the US anyways).

  • Draces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He plans to deport birth right citizens if they’re living with illegal parents. He and the supreme court do not gaf about the law and a pardon isn’t some additional barrier they won’t ignore. If anything this would give them a path to normalize ignoring pardons

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      To be a little fair I think that got overblown. When you listen to him talk about it he frames it as having listened on family separation. He also says there will be a choice. Now how much do I believe him over cretins like Miller who literally salivating at the chance to do Operation Wetback 2? I can’t say. But that news interview did several weird things. Like when he said he’d go to the people about the 14th, the interviewer kept badgering him about executive orders until he shrugs and says, “sure if we can”, in a noncommittal way. That’s just pure badgering of an old partially senile man until he says the funny and everyone breathlessly prints newspaper headlines.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even if he did, trump will get the supreme court to give him the go-ahead anyways.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It wouldn’t even be possible if he did want to.

      Given how government works at breakneck glacial speed and they would never be able to process everyone in time. Maybe they could handle some of the ones with cases, but not anywhere near everyone. They would have to make contact, start the process, process, and distribute paperwork on more than 11 million people. It would take them months just to make a broken website to gather information for submissions.

      “He could just declare it and anyone who came here before a given date would be protected.” How do you establish when someone got here? Supporting documents? They will be able to process that over the next few years, which they would be deported long before they could be processed.

      It would take an act of Congress to be able to do the legal maneuvers necessary to do what would be needed.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I commented this before, but I’m gonna repeat what I said:

    In immigration law, all arrests, all convictions, and the past five years of all juvenile proceeding, are all visible to USCIS and they are legally allowed to consider them when determining whether or not to allow someone to enter the US, whether or not to deport them, or whether or not to allow adjustment of legal status. Yes ALL records, even pardoned, even if sealed or expunged by court, they see everything. You can visit the USCIS website and see for yourself.

    And, even if you are never arrested, but the FBI investigated you a few times, USCIS might have access to those and if the FBI agents wrote bad things on your file, you might have problems with immigration or naturalization. Yea its quite fucked up, but it is what it is.

    Edit: Removed irrelevant portions

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    for that to happen he’d have to be pro-immigration, pro-immigrant, or explicitly against harming immigrants and having a spine. I don’t think he’s any of those things.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure the president can pardon civil infractions (AKA not actual federal crimes) and if he instead pardons any unrelated crimes, that’s a free talking point for the professional hypocrites from the American Fascist Party…

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am not an immigration lawyer, but I question exactly how much Biden can do here. Simply being undocumented is not a crime. Now, some undocumented immigrants commit crimes in the process of coming here, but in most cases being undocumented is a civil violation, not a criminal one . So, what exactly is there to pardon?

    Now. If Biden wanted to be real snarky, he could pardon Elon Musk for any crimes committed with regards to his immigration status. I don’t think he committed any, other than the rumor that he once crossed the land border after being denied entry on a plane from Canada. But that puts Musk in the position of having to formally acknowledge the “grey area” in his immigration journey, and put the GOP’s hypocrisy about this on center stage.

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why? Are Democrats that dense that you guys still think the vast majority of Americans believe illegal immigrants should just be left alone? I can’t believe how ridiculous that sounds…