• Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Could have just included the Ontario part snd Vancouver Island and it would still be true lol.

          • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            They “reappropriated”, and re-wrote, a ton of french words. As is their right, because all words are made up anyway

          • HellsBelle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            As was explained in the link I provided.

            “Tabarnak” (or its variants) is a Quebecois French swear word. In essence, it’s a profanity that derives its power from its connection to the Catholic Church. The word is derived from “tabernacle,” which in the Catholic faith is the sacred vessel that contains the consecrated host, representing the body of Christ. In Quebec, where Catholicism once held significant sway over society, the word “Tabarnak” has evolved into a potent exclamation, used to express a range of emotions, from anger and frustration to astonishment and awe.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          ? It’s just a fact. The urban agglomeration commonly known as Vancouver (any of them) is not on the large, west-coast island known as Vancouver island.

          I suspect you’re trolling.

          • pseudo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I am. It is a post about truncate Canada geography after all.
            However, being myself not versed in north-american geography, I’ve only learned today that there was such a thing as a Vancouver island.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Ah, okay, sorry. It’s the one on the west end of this map. The city of 3 million called Vancouver is just across the channel on the mainland. The same English navy captain charted them both, which is where the name comes from.

              The places I’ve heard of on the island are Victoria, Tofino and Nanaimo, but those aren’t very large centers, and if you include them then you have to include all the prairie cities as well. The rest is covered in mountains, temperate rainforest and retired British expats.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Well he landed there. But he’s not there now, not for a while. Nor the town: that’s on the mainland (aka the Big Island with Moncton and New Denver on it) .

          Fun fact: there’s a Victoria Island but Victoria isn’t there either, the person nor the town.

          • pseudo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Well he landed there.

            Was Vancouver a person? I’m learning a lot about Canada in this post about not knowing Canada (^_^)

  • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    I am sure some US hardliners see the map and wonder how is this country still independent.

    These positions are not defensible from military perspective.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      C’mon, it even looks like a rifle
      Who would be insane enough to invade a country, that already looks like a weapon?

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 days ago

        Careful how you phrase that, I heard a militia of collectors is forming to capture the biggest depiction of a gun in the world

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 days ago

      Trump did call Trudeau governor of the great state of Canada yesterday and suggested it should become the 51st state a ~week ago

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 days ago

        dude is too stupid to understand why he should not do it.

        until i hear some GOP chaney and kissegeer types, i aint worried.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah, I’m not worried about imminent invasion either. A trade war will already basically cause chaos, though, and it could escalate from there. Hopefully the government is up to the task.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      You want to know why Canada still exists despite having a fraction of the manpower or military of the United States?

      It’s because the United States likes Canada. We think they’re fun to have around.

        • Captain Aggravated
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s an abstract question to try to answer; it’s not like we sit around and ponder about y’all for hours on end but someone says “This is my friend Bill from Canada” and you just think “Oh cool.”

          On a societal level, we share the world’s longest international border, we’re massive trade partners, like, most of the Northwestern hemisphere’s best comedians come from Canada…we like Canada, we think they’re fun to have around.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah, that’s my impression too. It’s more like you never sat down and thought about annexing us to start with; at least this side of WWII. We’re pleasantly familiar feeling and stay out of the way, so there’s no reason to.

            Hopefully you know that “your country only exists at my pleasure” is not a compliment. I read this as a deliberate jab at first, but now I’m not so sure.

            • Captain Aggravated
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              We’re pleasantly familiar feeling and stay out of the way, so there’s no reason to.

              I think I’d go farther and say you’re pretty good friends; we have plenty of projects going together, we’ve got a giant waterfall we do a pretty good job sharing, etc.

              Hopefully you know that “your country only exists at my pleasure” is not a compliment.

              Wasn’t really designed to be; it’s more meant to chastise other imperial superpowers throughout history. If you went back through history and took the dominant superpower of any given era and plunked their leadership down in 1950’s Washington DC, how many of them form close economic ties and a mutual defense pact, and how many of them march on Ottawa?

              If I read our treaties correctly, the official attitude of the United States is more like “Canada shall cease to exist over our dead bodies.”

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                It’s a bit of an unfair comparison. WWII had just ended and the world was adjusting to the invention of nuclear weapons. The British stopped invading places too, and that was their whole thing. Also, don’t forget, before WWII you did try to annex us.

                To date you’ve chosen to sphere us instead, but it’s not because you’re all just nice guys.

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Touche but US capabilities are now that of a global empire, all of Canada is within few hundred mile from US border and its core literally cuts into the US while power disparity is wider than Ukraine/Russia.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Nobody who knows much seriously thinks we’d win a conventional war. We could slap together nukes pretty quickly, but we’d probably rather just get annexed. Our defences are all diplomatic.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        That took place entirely in the Great Lakes area. The other bit was still very, very Native.

        Also, we like to take credit for that, but that was basically the British Empire fighting for one of it’s colonies, and IIRC most of the British soldiers involved were not from here.

        No, we’re going back to the North Atlantic triangle days if the US goes funny like it appears to be going.

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I think that if climate change causes a lot of snow in the north to melt, it will create a lot of new arable space further north that people could potentially migrate to (even from other countries, eg climate migrants from the inhabitable equator)

    (disclaimer: never been to Canada)

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It would probably be extremely swampy for a long time. All that time it would release a tremendous amount of methane.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        I mean, it’s already swampy. Canada has the band of current habitability shown, followed by muskeg (frozen swamp) and boreal forest for most of it’s area, followed by a strip of tundra along the coast (and continuing into all those giant uninhabited islands). Swamps are actually carbon fixers, though; it’s the process of a swamp drying out and the exposed plant matter rotting that’s the problem.

        The tundra bit has permafrost that will thaw and rot into pretty pure methane, which is bad, but that’s in line to become new boreal forest next rather than new farmland.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      We’ve been choked by forest fire smoke every summer for a few years now. I hear some of the boreal forest that burned down is coming back as plains. Also, interestingly, we never stopped clearing new farmland around the high 50’s of latitude.

      It’s really noticeable already as far north as I am. People will talk about how freakish the weather has been here, and then suddenly get quiet if anyone says “climate” instead of “weather” because it’s oil country and they still want to be on the denier train. Man, humanity is depressing sometimes.

      The flip side is that the traditional breadbasket areas in the center-west of this strip are basically turning into desert.

      • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        I feel bad for them. They’ve got a shit lot in that they know they’re causing damage and they could stem that tide, but in doing so would have to give up what they know and have poured their lives into so far.

        Not everyone’s ready to sacrifice their comfort or livelihoods for others and jump when there’s no guarantee they’ll be caught by the social safety net.

        There will always be someone desperate and ready to deny the truth of their surroundings to fill the gap left, though.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          That’s big of you. I can sympathise with someone who’s doing bad things, but when they’re intellectually dishonest about it as well I start feeling like glassing everything and letting life start over.

          It’s just so damn hopeless. If that’s the level we’re at the atrocities will never stop, and we’ll keep blaming the other guy for it.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Canada is the north side of the st. Lawrence river, everything else is just that area’s backyard