PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoJet shaming, I thought we moved past this in 2024???lemmy.worldimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1103arrow-down17
arrow-up196arrow-down1imageJet shaming, I thought we moved past this in 2024???lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 day agoI think of safety scissors vs adult scissors whenever I see them side by side
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-21 day agoIt’s a illustration of the McDonnell Douglas Model 226. It was a prototype stealth aircraft from the 70’s that didn’t go anywhere as DARPA chose the precursor to the F-117 instead.
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·22 hours agoBecause smooth corners are easily visible on radar vs the F117 which was nearly invisible.
minus-squareJumutalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 hours agoonly because there’s parts that are perpendicular to the ray from the observer
I think of safety scissors vs adult scissors whenever I see them side by side
What’s the plane on the right?
It’s a illustration of the McDonnell Douglas Model 226. It was a prototype stealth aircraft from the 70’s that didn’t go anywhere as DARPA chose the precursor to the F-117 instead.
Because smooth corners are easily visible on radar vs the F117 which was nearly invisible.
only because there’s parts that are perpendicular to the ray from the observer
probably some pierre sprey thing?