• Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Because a single movie costs like 3 months of ad-tier Netflix.

      They’re not on ad-tier because they’re flushed with cash…

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          So does piracy, and it gives just as much money to the corporations who made the movie, if that’s something you’re worried about. And piracy don’t cost you shit.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Piracy is an option if they don’t care about the laws in their country, but some people care for one reason or another. The conversation was initially about about the cost of disc vs the cost of ad-supported streaming, so I offered a used option.

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          IF it exists in their country. It also requires enough people to buy the new ones first for it to be available for the second hand market.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            True. But there are also libraries with some content that can be lent, and also the option that _cryptagion offered up.

    • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Players can be expensive, but the most significant reason is probably having to get up and switch discs to watch something else. The vast majority of consumers have no idea how to rip a disc, nor the know-how required to set up a media server.