• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because a single movie costs like 3 months of ad-tier Netflix.

    They’re not on ad-tier because they’re flushed with cash…

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        So does piracy, and it gives just as much money to the corporations who made the movie, if that’s something you’re worried about. And piracy don’t cost you shit.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Piracy is an option if they don’t care about the laws in their country, but some people care for one reason or another. The conversation was initially about about the cost of disc vs the cost of ad-supported streaming, so I offered a used option.

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        IF it exists in their country. It also requires enough people to buy the new ones first for it to be available for the second hand market.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          True. But there are also libraries with some content that can be lent, and also the option that _cryptagion offered up.