Summary

Trump’s team is considering abolishing key banking regulators, including the FDIC and OCC, with plans to consolidate their functions under the Treasury Department.

Critics warn this could undermine public trust in banking, weaken deposit insurance protections, and risk another financial crisis.

The FDIC, established during the Great Depression, played a crucial role in managing the 2023 banking crisis.

Trump allies, backed by financial industry donors, are also targeting other consumer protections, reflecting sweeping deregulatory ambitions tied to Project 2025’s proposals.

Experts fear these moves could destabilize the economy.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      As the person said below, move your currency out of the US dollar into something like gold or buy a house with a 30-year mortgage because you are basically shorting the dollar for a hard, tangible asset.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This assumes that you will have an income of something worth more than the US dollar to pay the mortgage with. If your income continues at the same amount of US$ then your mortgage payment will still cost you the same amount of income, regardless of how the global valuation of the US$ changes.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          But the asset of the house itself would go up in value. I guess you do have to worry about the sales extortion when you go to sell it though. Which would not help very much. So I guess you’d end up at break even.

    • rishado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Well look, I’m not advocating for this coming government nor am I an economic expert. But in a vacuum one could impose tariffs on imported goods, tank the cost of labor in your own country, and force manufacturing back here, right? And in the long run, would be beneficial for local manufacturing instead of being so dependent on China. If it weren’t for the local oligarchy here I’d say it’s even a tough but fair plan for the economy. Knowing what we know, things will only get harder with no observable benefit for the working class as whatever improvement we manage to make will be sucked away by the ruling class. But the plan isn’t horseshit in a vacuum. Someone please feel free to tell me why I’m completely wrong as I’m not really speaking with too much conviction tbh

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I believe this is what Milei is selling in Argentina. I believe your assessment is correct. They’re telling us that it will be hard in the short term, but it will be worth it in the long term. The thing is, they mean worth it for the owner class. Working class people will take the brunt of it and it will just stay awful.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        23 hours ago

        And in the long run, would be beneficial for local manufacturing instead of being so dependent on China…Knowing what we know, things will only get harder with no observable benefit for the working class

        …and…

        Someone please feel free to tell me why I’m completely wrong as I’m not really speaking with too much conviction tbh

        Those tariffs would destroy our $1.95 trillion in exports from the USA because many of those are finished goods with input materials imported (and now tariffed to high heaven). source

        Modern manufacturing doesn’t depend on hundreds of thousands of human bodies anymore. New manufacturing factories would be highly automated and only employ a tiny fraction of the now unemployed workforce to produce the same amount of goods as in years past.

        “From 1960 to today, American steel mills have decreased from an average of 700,000 workers to just 83,000. And within the last 40 years, the productivity of labor has increased more than five times from approximately 10 man-hours per finished ton to under 2.” source

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          So we’re basically forfeiting a bunch of jobs related to and effected by procuring overseas input materials to gain a small fraction of manufacturing jobs? That just sounds like it will damage the economy and not bring it back up.

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Exactly why everyone with a brain has been shouting that this is the worst possible idea.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              Oh hell yeah, thats like 85% of things. I didnt know a brain was required to know that tbh with the sheer amount of visible foreign made items.

              • 4am@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Unfortunately for us, my dude, most people are asleep at the wheel.

                Overworked and underpaid, too exhausted and broke to pay attention to or influence politics.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In my home country (we all know the economy is gonna keep getting worse so we bet against it by default) we buy foreign currency (including ironically USD), gold, electronics or other tangible assets that hold their value.