Meet Ghostty 1.0: The GPU-accelerated terminal emulator exits beta after two years, challenging Kitty and Alacritty with its speed and features.
  • 1984@lemmy.todayEnglish
    101·
    2 days ago

    I tried it on Linux and input latency is very low. I can feel how characters appear the instant I press a key. It’s faster than kitty for me.

    When I run Helix under ghostty, it’s noticeably faster at drawing menus and filtering dialog boxes.

    I will use it for a while. Fun with new terminals.

    • bisby@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      I was using alacritty. Ghostty feels snappy like you said. I dont know if it’s “noticeably” faster in any meaningful way. but the out of the box config settings make the font rendering look much nicer than I had set up for alacritty.

      I told myself “I’ll use this for a while” as well but then realized… I don’t actually have a reason to change to anything else. It gets the job done. So until some other new shiny thing comes along, this is probably where I stay for a while.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.caEnglish
    10·
    2 days ago

    Sounds cool but I just can’t think of why I’d want a GPU accelerated terminal emulator.

    • Nate Cox@programming.devEnglish
      11·
      2 days ago

      Text rendering over the gpu is much smoother. For many users there may indeed be no perceptible difference but if you work on anything that scrolls a lot of text or has a tui that updates the screen rapidly the gpu can give a much nicer overall experience—especially if you use a lot of Unicode.

    • devilish666@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      2 days ago

      So you can run bash script in ultra setting, 4K, HDR, 400 fps, and plus Ray Tracing to make it cooler. /s

    • lime!@feddit.nuEnglish
      6·
      2 days ago

      try benchmarking a print statement. if the terminal is not optimized properly you’ll be spending a significant amount of time in them.

    • bisby@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      2 days ago

      I think this just happens to fall under the category of “some people care about milliseconds of rendering time, and some people don’t.” I don’t know if the GPU acceleration has anything to do with it, but this terminal emulator also has really good font rendering.

      If you are happy with your current terminal emulator, continue using it. If you heavily use your terminal emulator for a lot of things and in some things you’ve found that it stutters a bit, and you wished it was a bit smoother, get a GPU accelerated terminal emulator.

      And secret bonus option: Even if you are happy with your current terminal emulator, give it a try anyway. Ghostty has a “zero configuration” policy where their goal is for most people to never need to configure anything. Sane defaults. It’s a good out of the box experience. Give it a few test drives, and if you’re still perplexed about why you should care, then maybe it’s just not for you and you can switch back. If you go “that was pretty smooth, i dont have a reason to switch back” then maybe you’ll think about it differently.

    • Chocrates@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      2 days ago

      I have my tmux hot keys memorized, I have a hard time finding the value add of anything but the built in terminal emulator these days.

      I want to use a new one but I can’t find a reason.

      • bisby@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 days ago

        The point of a terminal like this isn’t necessarily to have more features. I have the tabs turned off (I also just use tmux). The point is to render smoothly and look/feel nice.

        Some people would rather spend a lot of money on a nice pen. It still is just a pen that writes. No additional features over a 25 cent Bic pen. But the smoothness of the writing, the hand feel, consistency of line thickness, etc… to some people that matters. No extra features, it just looks and feels a bit better… But if all you are doing is writing a grocery list, you may not care. And if you don’t care, you aren’t wrong. This just doesn’t apply to you. If you don’t have a reason, you don’t need to find one. It’s just not applicable.

        But some people do care. They do have a reason. And they are also not wrong to care. Their reasons just may not apply to you because you have different workloads or priorities (or maybe they do, and you just haven’t realized that it’s a thing you care about)

    • GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pubEnglish
      22·
      2 days ago

      It really makes a difference in some cases. Idk how noticeable it is on overpriced criminal-exclusive flagship CPUs but on mine it is noticeable.