• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Unlike most other inmates, who play football or exercise in groups, Lai walks alone in what appears to be a 5-by-10-meter (16-by-30-foot) enclosure surrounded by barbed wire under Hong Kong’s punishing summer sun before returning to his unairconditioned cell in the prison.

    The publisher of the now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper, Lai disappeared from public view in December 2020 following his arrest under a security law imposed by Beijing to crush a massive pro-democracy movement that started in 2019 and brought hundreds of thousands onto the streets.

    In a separate case, an appeals court is due to rule Monday on a challenge that Lai and six other activists have had filed against their conviction and sentencing on charges of organizing and taking part in an unauthorized assembly nearly four years ago.

    He was scheduled to go on trial last December, but it was postponed to September while the Hong Kong government appealed to Beijing to block his attempt to hire a British defense lawyer.

    “My father is in prison because he spoke truth to power for decades,” Lai’s son, Sebastien, said in a May statement to a U.S. government panel, the Congressional-Executive Commission on China.

    Lai, who suffers from diabetes and was diagnosed with high blood pressure in 2021 while in detention, is treated as a Category A prisoner, a status for inmates who have committed the most serious crimes such as murder.


    The original article contains 589 words, the summary contains 232 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dumb questions here. Why are they hiring a British lawyer and testifying in front of the US congress? Like i understand the actual why of that second one, but it’s not like the house of representatives in the US has any actual power to save the guy that they would exercise. Like would a British lawyer have any more luck in getting him out than a Hong Kong lawyer? Are they worried no one will take the case?

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The British lawyer might have more relevant training among western lawyers depending on how old he is and if he dealt with old HK law. One needs to conclude that either no HK lawyer is willing to take the case (perhaps due to fear of retribution) or the westerners think it would be a bad move (for example, if a HK lawyer simply tells the truth to Congress and does not get punished back in HK). I’m just speculating, though.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back to your point about abuse, though,

    … except you don’t. Trial by jury is a decent system that decouples justice from political power. In this case, the politicians decided that was an inconvenience and did away with it.

    What we should be worried about it is actual abuses, not potential abuses.

    Agreed. This was an actual abuse.

        • sab@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s in the headline: “pro-democracy publisher”.

          He was a newspaper publisher in Hong Kong who refused to get in line. That’s all.

            • socsa@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Literally ran a newspaper which espoused democracy and independent governance (Hong Kong status quo at the time).

              You might also be interested to learn that democratically elected legislators in Hong Kong were arrested en masse from the floor of their legislative building for the exact same reason. It’s as bad as it sounds.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Link me that information from any source that actually reports on it fully. I’m just trying to understand what actually happened there.

            • sab@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              He published newspapers. He was a newspaper publisher.

              There’s no free speech in China. Publishing a newspaper that doesn’t follow the line of the Chinese Communist Party is a crime, and after the CCP took control over Hong Kong that applied to him as well.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You could get arrested (rightfully and not) in most of the world for publishing a myriad of things while still calling yourself “pro democracy” (see jan. 6 protests in the US)

                I just wanted to know what he was actually saying to motivate this arrest…

                • socsa@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The Jan 6 people were not arrested for publishing a newspaper.

                • sab@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The arrest itself was actually “motivated” by what they referred to as unauthorised assembly during the pro-democracy protests. This 73 year old man went somewhere he shouldn’t have, and clearly threatened the mighty CCP enough to warrant 20 months in prison in the process. Additional charges up to life are being stacked on top following from the “security law” meant to silence pro-democracy voices in Hong Kong, but as far as I know these charges have not been made public. His newspaper was published daily though, so the nature of his crime was quite public if you’re really interested.

                  Here’s a BBC story on the history of the newspaper.

                  I’m sorry I couldn’t find anything published by Xinhua News Agency, I have a feeling you might have appreciated that more.

        • socsa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          We will never know the details of the charges, because all the legal proceedings will be secret, which is the standard in China.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do not kiss Uncle Sam’s ass. I’m not about to believe anything based on hearsay.

        • Ukuli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          He ran a prominen newspaper called Daily Apple, which was shut down by the government.