Nah, little/big tits are character traits that span multiple races so they’re probably going to be fetishized more broadly just by virtue of that.
So here we might need another dimension. I’d call it depth or thoroughness. The idea of submissive asian women might be more thorough in its fetishized details, but probably isn’t as broadly as things like tit size.
I mean, I thought we all were goven that Freud’s original definition was something along the lines of “an object that must be present in order for the patient to reach orgasm”.
Nah, little/big tits are character traits that span multiple races so they’re probably going to be fetishized more broadly just by virtue of that.
So here we might need another dimension. I’d call it depth or thoroughness. The idea of submissive asian women might be more thorough in its fetishized details, but probably isn’t as broadly as things like tit size.
You’re confusing aesthetic preference with fetish.
I mean, I thought we all were goven that Freud’s original definition was something along the lines of “an object that must be present in order for the patient to reach orgasm”.
At that point my hand qualifies.