• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We watched the first 15 minutes of Section 31 waiting for it to get good, and it never did so we gave up on it. It only struck me later what bothered me so much about what we saw.

    Prior to this movie, who did we know in Section 31:

    Reed

    Fiercely loyal, by the the book, clever

    Bashir

    CRAAAAZZY smart, caring, scientifically minded, big thinker strategist

    William Boimler

    High achiever, rapidly upwardly mobile getting a crew position on the Titan before joining Section 31 and given his own command closing rifts in the multiverse.

    Khan Noonien Singh

    Brilliant human augment, hyper intelligent, calculating

    All of these were top tier thinkers. They had loyalty to the Federation and were willing to do what they thought best to secure the Federations future even if it meant getting dirty so others could stay clean. Nothing I saw in the first 15 minutes of the Section 31 movie had any characters like these. We got the worst “bad of misfits” style buddy-action characters. I hated all 15 minutes that I watched of the Section 31 movie.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I wouldn’t consider jj-Kahn to have any loyalties or concerns for the Federation. He was self-serving and only cared about his other augments.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think he believed himself and the other augments were the true representation of humanity. He was loyal to the idea of humanity’s continued existence to the better. He just had a really twisted definition of “better”. Still, I would have been more okay with JJ Kahn to be in Section 31 than what was introduced in the Section 31 movie.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Indeed. Section 31 doesn’t need disposable fodder. they are an agency full of 007 types, not ‘suicide squad in space.’

  • dumbass@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well this has made my day exponentially better! I had kinda given up hope in more Orville but if they’re gonna keep making it I’m fine for a little break in between, gives me time to re-watch star trek a few times.

    • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It depends. Prodigy, Lower Decks, and Strange New Worlds are all great (the former two take a moment to get into their element, though).

      Probably watch 10 episodes of Prodigy before making your verdict, and probably through the first few episodes of season 2 for Lower Decks.

      For Discovery, I’ve found it make many mistakes, but also been, it’s been fun at times. I’ve only watched through part of season 4.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I liked Discovery, but you can’t background-watch it. If you stop paying attention for 5 minutes you’ll lose track of what’s going on. It’s very JJ-trek.

    • _NetNomad@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      i guess it depends on what you consider to be the good stuff to begin with. SNW is essentially more TOS and TNG which makes it a pretty safe bet. Lower Decks is great but it’s very different, being a comedy first and foremost. if you want to play it safe i would avoid Discovery and Picard, and that’s coming from one of the ten people who liked parts of both of them

    • otto
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only watch Picard season three. Skip the first two seasons. Also, lower decks is pretty great. Strange new worlds… Your mileage may vary on that. Avoid discovery.

      • Zip2@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Finally someone who agrees with me! Season 3 was what season 1 should have been.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Anti-Trek? Whaaaat? It’s basically TOS/TNG but with Family Guy toilet humor and cursing. 🤨 I didn’t have much hopes for it when it first started, but it actually feels more like classic Trek than shit like Discovery.

    • ummthatguy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The whole show was made in reverence to TOS and the “golden era” of Trek. It’s a bit goofier, but the show as it went on tackled several tough social topics that would make Berman squirm.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yes the episodes where the most manliest crew member is hermaphrodite and has partner drama with someone that looks as manly as them are hilarious

        • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          if you meant Bortus, no, he’s male not intersex. male Moclans laying eggs doesn’t make them not male. their daughter Topa’s storyline has intersex vibes but it’s questionable whether she can be called that

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Somehow people don’t see it.

      But I mean, some people like Enterprise , section 31 or Picard that contain the worst morals ever shown in a Star Trek show so people are not going to see the problem with the orville.