• NewDark@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You can describe socialist and communist policies and people generally love them. You just can’t use those thought terminating trigger words.

    • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That comes from dishonest politicians and media, who twist things for their benefit. They frame certain acts like they are coming for your 2 chickens, when in reality, they are coming for a rich fucks’ 100000 chickens. Such people have a vested interest in fooling the people with 2 chickens. Hence, they campaign by equating such measures with ‘scary’ words like ‘communism’. Propaganda works. These kinds of tricks are bread and butter of advertising industry. So why not politicians and media?

    • pastermil
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Describing it is one thing.

      Actually implementing it is another.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        there is technique and whole ideologies and entire categories of political theory in the left all literally dedicated to taking control off oligarchs and implementing it with varying levels of irl success.

        there is more to the left of liberals and they address a bunch of these things.

        • pastermil
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          In Nordic countries, they do have something along the line. Although it ended up being democratic socialism, which is left-center instead of far-left authoritarian.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The Nordics aren’t Socialist in any capacity, heavy industry and large firms are squarely in the Private Sector, and they earn the bulk of their income from acting essentially as a landlord in country form, from predatory IMF loans.

            Moreover, all Socialism is democratic in some form, the idea that there is a niche of Socialism that alone is Democratic is a misnomer. Democratic Socialism is better described as Reformist Socialism.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            nordic countries exploit countries like mine for our natural resources and human capital in a brutal way. their capitalism just succeeds in neatly hiding away the suffering abroad. their government is not leftist, and that model is not sustainable for everyone to adopt.