I’m a big fan of solar panels but the alignment could’ve been better!

  • EatPlutonium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    you cant go any closer to the skylight or you’re gonna punch holes in the flashing and it will leak.

    • Beliriel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look on the bright side. You can place the plunger right next to the stove and it has space to stand.

  • nyahlathotep
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It does like a little annoying, but since I’m not a roofer or solar panel installer I feel like there’s probably a reason for this that I don’t know.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There is. They have to be installed on the rafters/trusses and the skylight is in the way of being able to put them all on the same rafter/truss.

      They’re usually 16 inches in center so moving over one rafter would put that row off by 16 inches. They probably have the panel installed as far to the end of the support track that they can so it’s only a little bit off instead of a full 16 inches.

  • Snipe_AT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    hell, i think it’s cool. maybe the upper left set of squares could move right a couple inches, but they look good!

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to believe that we are in a transitional period with solar panels, and soon it will be more common for them to just be an integral part of the roof. However I don’t see much uptake for the companies that have tried offering such products. Has anyone seen a house with integrated panels?

      • JohnDClay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Needs government regulation to force it, otherwise they’ll just do the cheapest thing

    • wabafee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Elon’s SolarCity company did something like that but it failed because of inefficiency of the panels and just expensive to install. To be fair I think having this is better than no solar panels at all. I think this will remain common until those two I mentioned with SolarCity gets resolved.

    • AlataOrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds way more expensive and like it has way more points of failure if you live somewhere that occasionally gets hail, tornadoes, or hurricanes. I can only speak for those locations as that’s primarily where I’ve lived, but I would much prefer my roof to be a roof then to chance anything coming in.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well yeah I agree that when you try to meld two things into one you generally get something more expensive than both which doesn’t perform as well as either. For something as common and well established as roofing materials, it’s going to be very very hard to beat conventional roofs on price and performance while adding electricity generation. Though to be fair, conventional solar panels probably get ripped apart in a hurricane, too.

        • AlataOrange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My worry is less them getting ripped apart during a storm and more the potential hole they could leave behind due to their destruction. Any hole in a continuous surface is a weak point.