• mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    The program will be picked up by others in the fullness of time. It’s a shit move, for sure, but I bet the calculus here is that the US will still benefit from someone else doing the hard work but without paying for it.

    The only thing the US loses here is prestige. And I’m totally fine with that.

    • Franklin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      i don’t think so, the reality is the scale of these programs often benefit from the reach and predictable finding government provides.

      it’s the same reason that foreign charities for medicine are most effective when done at a government level.

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        You don’t think the program will be picked up by another government actor? It’s only the US that can do this?

        Hmmm 🤔. I think that given how important the work is some other government organisation will absolutely pick up the work if the US want to wash their hands of it.