The classic tradition of pulling up the ladder behind them continues.

  • Untimely_manners@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should sign their houses over to the government to cover the cost of these government services they want to access to rather than tax workers.

    • Arbition@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      To some extent, yes, but also no. This is just a symptom of wealth accumulation, it’s not all about ‘boomers’ it’s about greedy people, it just so happens that many boomers were in a strong position to be greedy and get lucky. We still have corporations and banks making too much money, we shouldn’t forget about those.

      • Sal@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This exactly. Though I’m pissed at the ladder being pulled up behind them as OP so vividly put it, as far as the decisions made by boomers before Facebook and Murdoch addled their brains, I can’t honestly say I would have acted differently in their shoes.

  • Kapow@exploding-heads.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    And the sad part is young people keep voting for these dishonest clowns who are going to suck your wallet dry.

    Who needs more help - somebody who had worked their entire life and saved, paid off their home, kids moved out long ago. . .

    Or

    A thirty year old, not yet in their prime earning years trying to raise 3 kids while paying off their mortgage and car loan.

    Wake up Australia

    • Cruxil 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not that I agree with the government considering introducing new taxes after they explicitly stated that they wouldn’t, but your proposed scenario is a little disingenuous (also ending your comment with ‘Wake up x’ is fairly cliche at this point).

      There are plenty of disadvantaged elderly Australians who are living in poverty and being treated like second class citizens based on their age, I’m sure that in most cases this money would be used to aid this group of people rather than the cashed up, multi-property owning boomers.

      The mentioned task force is also considering increasing taxes for the mentioned wealthy older generation to help support their peers who haven’t done so well for themselves, which sounds like a more fair proposition to me (someone who is not in that group).

      • Kapow@exploding-heads.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are always exceptions at both ends of the spectrum, but the broad averages are as I said.

        Do not let them fool you into thinking it will be someone else paying for it, somehow it is always you.

      • Kapow@exploding-heads.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Conservatives care about our kids and do not think they should have to pay for our wasteful spending.

        My generation benefits from this largess, so go ahead and pay if you want. But as a parent and grandparent I would prefer to see you spend this money on creating a healthy environment for you and your kids.

        But believe me when I tell you our generation has had the opportunity to save, pay off our house, pay off our car, have the kids move out.

        I still remember, life was a lot tougher financially when our family was young.

        But if you want to pay, go ahead. The government will never say no.