• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, looks like that’s how it works. They store up potential energy when the panels work, and then release it as needed. This solves the storage problem associated with solar.

      • mr_washee_washee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        a 1kwh LifePo4 battery costs almost 220$, so batteries are still expensive as heck. water dams or hydrogen production (it takes 48kwh of electricity to produce 1kg of H2 lol ) are good ways of storing solar energy

        • Nick
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          And with batteries you only have a couple thousand charge cycles. With hydro-electric I feel like it’s limitless.

          • _haha_oh_wow_
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            It still needs to be maintained, but it’s still gotta be way more cost effective in the long run.

            • Nick
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Agreed. And I can imagine the turbines needs updates as well.

              • _haha_oh_wow_
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yup, all sorts of stuff has to be maintained and repaired.

  • JaneDoe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    The math is a bit weird: currently they have 3GW for 700 thousand households and 100GW should somehow serve 100 millions. Anyway great news, hopefully it inspires more countries to do similar projects

  • sauna7843@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Impressive. Thanks for sharing this! China has done some technological incredible feats.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      China is the main reason I’m not a complete doomer when it comes to transitioning off fossil fuels. They’re showing that it’s possible to do at scale and rapidly.

      • sauna7843@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        China seems to be able to easily start and complete megaprojects without much bureaucracy. It is a trait I wish the west would inspire to. Of course there are also traits that are not as appealing and should be avoided.

        Regarding fossil fuels, I am beyond surprised how both superpowers are not placing significant funding into fusion. ITER in theory (and almost certainty in practice) has shown that you can generate a 1< Q factor for energy projection.

        Imagine a Manhattan project for fusion instead of nuclear weapons. A project to this scale would very likely be able to fully transistion the world into clean, reliable, and cheap energy that doesn’t require batteries, sunlight, or natural terrain to exploit.

        The amount of lives you would save from free energy is also incredible! Place a few reactors in Africa and you have a way to desalinate ocean water, as well as provide free energy for food generation.