• SignullGone@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a great find. Thanks for posting! I believe it’s an open secret that the DoE most likely has much of the answers we seek regarding UAP.

    • UndefinedIsNotAFunction@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The UAP Disclosure Act straight up calls them out as a place where this information has been classified too highly to keep it out of reach of anybody not involved. Grusch confirmed as much with his statements in the recent interview (we get more this weekend!)

      • SignullGone@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good clarification to make. It was an open secret. Hopefully the revelations this week will be satisfactory.

  • HM05@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s interesting seeing more government groups establishing pages on UAP. I’m curious about what is driving this and their motivation in creating public resources now. It could be setting the appearance of transparency. Or they may assume the NDAA UAP clause will pass and they’re setting a public narrative in advance.

    • UndefinedIsNotAFunction@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maaan, I’m really hoping it does pass. I know there’s a whole lot of hullabaloo about it being removed in the house, but we don’t have actual confirmation of that yet. I will say I’ll be pretty pissed if it doesn’t go through. Remember to call your reps!

      I’m super curious about the motivation here too. We’ve now got NASA doing research, AARO, CBP, DOE, and who knows who else.