• geekworking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    229
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This includes the private residences of subcontractors and contractors who run businesses out of their homes

    Even more crazy is that you can’t tell anyone you’ve been raided, including seeking or talking to legal counsel.

    So you technically are denied legal counsel if you are targeted by a blatently unconstitutional search.

    And it’s legal for them to destroy any incriminating records that they want at any time.

    Unlimited power to target whoever they want and no legal recourse.

    Welcome to Germany 1935.

    • gravitas_deficiency
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      119
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This law is categorically unconstitutional. It is a prima facie contradiction of multiple specific amendments in the bill of rights. This will certainly be thrown out - even hard-right judges won’t be able to justify this. It’s clearly not reasonable in the slightest.

        • TheJims@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their motives are strictly unconstitutional and pure evil. Republicans want their own private gestapo.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s political theatre. If it passes, they get a Gestapo. If it is thrown out (likely), they can chum the waters and get their base frothing about “woke judges” or some shit.

          Either way, they win.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        even hard-right judges won’t be able to justify this.

        They don’t have to justify anything any more. You should stop pretending the constitution matters.

        • Evie @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It does matter! It matters to us… unfortunately totalitarianism has taken control and the AC along with the GOP do not care… the mask is off… it is now time for the 2nd amendment to be actually enacted by a well regulated militia who protects the constitution as the 2nd amendment laid out

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        even hard-right judges won’t be able to justify this. It’s clearly not reasonable in the slightest.

        I dunno about that, Supreme Court looking pretty right wing lately

        • gravitas_deficiency
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The SC wants to maintain the roots of their power. Undercutting certain parts of the constitution does the opposite of that, because it implies others can do the same in areas they don’t want touched.

    • LetterboxPancake
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me more of Eastern Germany to be honest. But yeah, that’s fucked up no matter where it happened before.

    • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So moral of the story, keep everything backed up to the cloud. Though the fun thing is, NC is so awash in guns, sending goons to raid someone’s home is likely to result in some ventilated goons.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Setting aside this story that is absolutely ridiculous and horrible, why are people obsessed with claiming that nazi Germany has begun with every scary story out there? Calm your tits.