• Framecode@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish
    5·
    2 years ago

    I trust Artedu to get it right. I’m not big on Havertz either but you have to remember he’s been at Chelsea for a while now. And Chelsea fucks players up.

  • vizhal007@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    2 years ago

    I don’t think he’s what we need, Jesus is a similar profile striker and ESR is a similar profile 8. We should use the funds on Caicedo and maybe a striker of a different profile

  • Roxamir@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    2 years ago

    I feel like he’d be overpriced for what he’d contribute to the club. Hard pass imo

  • NorfolkingChance@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    2 years ago

    My instant reaction was the HARDEST no, but then you look at what Chelsea have done to almost every one of those players brought in over the last 3 years or so and it makes you wonder what sort of player is potentially in there 🤔

  • Naryn@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    2 years ago

    The price HAS to be right on this one.

    If we can get him at £30-40m then I’m fairly happy with it but they want 60m last I checked and he’s just not shown anything near that. Presumably with a wage cut too, can’t be paying Havertz and Saka similar wages

  • kuijun@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    2 years ago

    think I’m in the minority here, but I rate Havertz. he’s technically gifted, quick, and has some height which we lack up top.

    of course there are questions about his attitude, but it would be hard not to be affected playing in that mess of a Chelsea squad.

    it depends on the price we can get him for, but if Edu/Arteta want him then let’s get it done.

      • kuijun@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        2 years ago

        so would I. from Madrid’s perspective, I’d imagine he would be third choice behind Mbappe and Kane though, right?

    • Roxamir@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      2 years ago

      I agree he’s quality, but coming from Chelsea and to a rival that’s pushing for a title, his price will definitely be inflated. If it hinders our ability bolster other areas of our squad, I don’t think it’s a good buy. But like you said, if it’s a good price and Eduteta rate him…

      Edit: but to buy

      • kuijun@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        yeah, agree the inflated price is the big catch. i think the angle we’re shooting for is that Chelsea have to sell, and there aren’t a lot of clubs whose offers we couldn’t match. no one in Germany/France/Spain is paying 50m for him, so that leaves United (maybe?), City (no way), Newcastle (maybe?), Spurs (lol), and Liverpool (no way) as realistic competitors for the purchase.