• zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gazans have the right to revolution, just as the Americans, French, and Chinese did.

    Condemning violence in revolution is akin to condemning the formation of these countries we have today. Palestinians have exhausted all other options.

    • GreatWhiteNope [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The formation of these countries we have today is condemnable and it’s exactly what Israel is attempting to do, which is why they must be stopped.

      • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The silly thing is that, while on the surface it looks like a religiously-motivated conflict, at its core it’s a socioeconomic one. The massive gap in economic opportunity caused by the Zionist regime’s comprehensive repression of Palestinian rights, the displacement of people from their own homes, and the complete segregation of society was bound to lead to conflict with or without religious motivation.

        People blaming religion for this issue are the same people blaming religion for the Troubles.

        China’s case of Xinjiang shows that massive forced social and economic reform can eradicate extremism without launching bullets and missiles at every person of colour who looks at you wrong.

    • Fox@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They shot down innocent festival goers. Young people. Killed and raped, and driven around in the back of a truck for display. They even took elderly women hostages.

      This is not acceptable, in any sort of way. Never.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gazans have the right to revolution, just as the Americans, French, and Chinese did.

      The difference is that those were successful in overthrowing the regime. Even at the time of them happening the established regimes across the world did condemn those, too.

      I’m not arguing that the Palestinians should not revolt. However if you do, it helps if you deal a decisive blow. If history shows one thing is is that failed attempts at revolution lead to harsh persecution.

      If anything this attempt has strengthened the Israeli goverment, where Israelites were finally fed up with the shenanigans of power concentration of Netanyahu and revolting against him, now everyone falls in line, because of this attack.

      I’m not disputing the legality, tactically it’s been a huge mistake. And the ramifications are horrendous, but I don’t think anybody is surprised by that (I must note that I abjectly oppose those).

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So are they going to lift it at a reasonable time (edit: and keep it lifted!), or is the far-right government going to try and starve out the whole population?

  • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel is its own country and responsible for its own actions. Don’t drag the West into this just because some financial aid is given.

    • rolandtb303@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      USA sends on average 3.8 billion a year in aid to Israel. Israel also has a lobbying system in the US to skew public opinion in favor of Israel (the most prominent groups are CUFI and AIPAC), where in certain divisions, Mossad bots spew Israeli propaganda on fake accounts (much like the Kremlin bots).

      The government always touts Israel as “our best ally”. Not to mention that USA always has unequivocal support to Israel, even if they might criticise them for a couple things. Funny how they support the oppressed while also supporting the aggressor.