Happy Sunday, or Monday, depending where in the world you are!

  • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In some cases, like with climate change, failing to act at all is functionally the same as acting against a solution. Climate change, among other things, is something where statistically we know that more voters would result in more support for preventing climate change, so it’s not just a case of “well what if the voters were all idiots anyways?”. We’ve seen that higher voters turnouts trend in a particular direction regarding particular topics. And ultimately less voter turnout and less people being informed to some degree regarding politics is less democratic by nature.

    • spauldo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not arguing against people being informed. I’m arguing against uninformed people being encouraged to vote.

      High voter turnout does change the results in many cases, but generally that’s simple negative feedback. Average Americans didn’t have to be well informed to vote against Trump in 2020, for instance - Trump saw to that when he made an ass of himself publicly on a regular basis. And people notice things like wars and recessions and whatnot. That’s not the same as an informed voter base.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not arguing against people being informed. I’m arguing against uninformed people being encouraged to vote.

        They’re being encouraged to become informed.