• The_v@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anti-material rifles were initially designed to take out tanks. However all modern tanks have thick enough armor to deflect its bullets.

    Now APC’s, trucks, vans, and most engines and electronics are destroyed by these rounds. Hence the anti-material label now.

    • Treczoks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given some of the antique tanks the Russians pulled out of the moth ball heap, it might still be an anti-tank-weapon occasionally …

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        The barrel is thicker than the armor on tanks. Usually they weigh in at over 2 tons of steel. The circular shape also makes it very likely to deflect the impact like sloped armor.

        It might make a little ding in the paint.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are designed to withstand huge pressures while maintaining their structure.

        • Patches
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          She must be very strong if she can hold up 4 tons of steel.