• Aelar64@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might have meant that at some point, but it certainly does not mean that now

    • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      this is the most generous possible interpretation of the gadsden, while ignoring the meaning behind the sabocat, and red/black imagery.

      ps: the American revolution was a lateral move, replacing a hereditary monarchy with a dictatorship of capital. The ‘founding fathers’ were their time’s equivalent of musk and bezos, and they explicitly wanted to protect the interest of the capital owning class from the will of the working class and those humans who they kept as property.

        • RothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How so?

          Meaning of symbols and words evolves over time. Swastica is originaly Hindu good luck charm, but defending it’s use in the West with it is utter nonsense. Same with Gadsden flag. Once it was (arguebly, Founding Fathers were a bunch of rich landowners) a symbol of fighting oppression, but it has been approprieted by far right