The president’s comment that he has “no confidence” in the civilian death toll in Gaza provided by Palestinians incensed community leaders.

  • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. After 70+ years of occupation “we’ll look into it” is the best we can offer? Really?
    2. Who would these Peace keepers be? IDF? Pro-Israel US troops? Iranian military? There are no neutral forces for this job. Also, why only peace keeping to further subjugate the Palestinian people? Why no peace keeping forces to keep Israel from committing more ethnic cleansing?
    3. Huh?
    • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thank you for offering criticisms instead of downvoting.

      1. It’s better late than never. And looking into it still paves the way to put some people in jail.
      2. It should be outside of those you mentioned. They’ll probably consider another war without interference, so yes, there should be peacekeeping forces occupying Gaza/West Bank, and some internal checking within Israel. It’s a good question of who though. None of those you listed are good suggestions, and I do struggle to think of a neutral one. The closest I can think of is United Nation, but that’s probably not enough.
      3. One of the condition to prevent wars is acceptance of other people. So, yes, there should be support toward each other. Some of the Israelis are in support for Palestine civilians, and some Palestinians are in support of Israel civilians. More of that is needed. Much more in fact.
    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have a better alternative beyond “let the terrorists keep running the show and occasionally bombing Israel”?

        • Zippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why isn’t it their land? They have legitimate claims a thousand years back but were ran off then.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            By that logic the United States shouldn’t exist, either. It’s built on stolen land with legitimate claims going back tens of thousands of years.

            • Zippy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. Forever and a day you have no rights to exsist except from the place where your ancestors came from a million years ago.

              You rather made my point that the Palestinians have no greater right than the Israelites. Hamas on the other hand has stated with no ambiguity that their policy is to exterminate absolutely every last Jew in the middle East.

          • PsychedSy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The initial Isreali settlements were purchased land as well.

              • PsychedSy
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                To back up the Jews that had been returning? They started to return in larger numbers due to pogroms in places like Russia.

                  • PsychedSy
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Feel free to tell me what your point is. I’m already done with the “let me pick one random event in a long history of events” shit.