• smokingManhole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I partially agree. They created a monopoly because they offer the best search engine service. You can’t be accused of making a monopoly if your competition is embarrassingly bad and no one wants to use any service but yours.

    What they are doing now, regardless of how they gained this monopoly, is ensuring that every cow that feeds on the grass of their field yields profitable milk.

    • Night Monkey
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      DDG is pretty good and I use it exclusively. Google spams your search results with sponsored links. That’s bullshit

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Noone would care if they only had a monopoly in the search engine market. But they are also the biggest ad network, email provider and browser maker, and they also own the (effectively only) video platform.

    • AmbroisindeMontaigu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But if you implement something in your browser that allows websites to block anything that isn’t an accepted browser (and websites use it because they don’t want their precious data to feed random AIs) you effectively prevent any potential competition from crawling websites to build a search index that might threaten your position.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I meant, if everyone is running googles web integrity API it also effectively allows google to ban other browsers from even existing by denying them access to all major sites.