• 3 Posts
  • 1.17K Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 19th, 2024

help-circle




  • Clearly Mashable is not real and genuine journalism, and this Cecily Mauran person who wrote the article is either trash at their job, or it’s a click bait website.

    There’s a list of names (taken from a social media post) at the bottom of the article. Search the first one Brain Hood, you find out he’s an Australian Mayor who sued ChatGPT because it claimed he’d taken bribes, when he hadn’t. He sued them for spreading misinformation, so they shut the chat down when he’s mentioned because he’s sued them.

    I have little doubt this explains all the names.

    People are worried AI will spread misinformation like it’s something new, when we have people like Cecily Mauran and Mashables already doing it.








  • Yes, for him it is about ego, winning, and being seen as a winner - and weirdly enough being loved and acclaimed.

    He is a very social thinker.

    That massive douche bag ego of his isn’t necessarily fascist in totality, but has fascist elements due to his class and capitalist attitudes… So he’s definitely some sort of threat to democracy. But it’s mostly egoic, rather than fascist by way of his values. This is difficult to explain to people because of the left/right political narrative and social prohibitions on some of these topics.

    …but fascists had a bunch of values and views that Trump just doesn’t. He doesn’t want like “a greater Germany and stronger people for national and international supremacy” or anything like that. He just wants to be seen as a winner, a cool guy, and the one with the most toys.

    Still a threat to democracy, and doing massive amounts of damage. Still likely to sell America to worse people (some of whom are fascists), but in diagnosing the condition it’s important to name it correctly. To know exactly which parasite is at the top at any one moment.


  • The do pay if their are products of the same type, eg. one is Chinese with the tarrifs priced in, the other from a country without that tariff on it. Consumers will choose the cheaper option over the Chinese tarrifed version (resulting in less sales).

    Producers in china then report lower sales in the American market, putting pressure on their government.

    So although the cost is theoretically paid by consumers it is still a form of pressure (depressed sales) on the producer. That’s what I meant in seeing it as a possible negotiating tool.

    The left/right political narrative is elsewhere though, not in a place that is about investigating these angles of understanding. That’s okay. I accept that.




  • The election result is a very touchy and emotional subject for most Americans. On the left and on the right.

    Ironically the right are less destabilized by their emotions. The left are the ones shaken and unable to recover even to discuss what’s going on.

    That’s a problem. That’s part of the loss. It’s understandable it’s why he won (there was an emotional game played on the left and right by Trump’s campaign). Which is a slightly different topic than why the establishment dems lost. But both pertain to an very emotional election.

    …so I understand you are rendered incapable as far as discussing these things. Your emotions are understandable. Someone in power is finally being open about selling your democracy, your rights, to fascists. That would be upsetting.

    But that’s got little to do with me being able to see how his tariff plan benefits him. Nor does being able to see what he’s doing make me “full of shit”.

    But I understand it’s rightfully a sore point for any American who is a reasonably intelligent person.