• 9 Posts
  • 2.52K Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 3rd, 2024

help-circle
  • Windows is decades behind other operating systems in installation technology. For a long time it was so incredibly painful and hard to get right that it seemed like everyone paid for a product called InstallShield to do it for them. Once I knew what an InstallShield installer looked like, I realized that I was encountering vanishingly few pieces of Windows software whose installers weren’t paying for InstallShield.

    Wix is free and open and didn’t seem actively maintained last time I tried it. It takes the raw disaster of the Windows Install ecosystem, and adds the brittleness of XML. It’s a free, utterly painful, alternative to InstallShield. No fault if the Wix team, the Windows install ecosystem is just that bad.

    Winget, NuGet and Cocolately are solving the problem, finally, but they’re still decades behind Apt and RPM.

    Anyway, I assert that building an install package correctly in Windows is one of the weird lost skills like “how to make a pencil”. It turns out no one knows how to make a complete pencil, just their own part of it.

    The folks who wrote InstallShield understood building Windows packages backwards and forwards. I haven’t seen evidence that any living human since has achieved the same level of mastery (of an admittedly deeply thankless job).




  • What will get manufactured locally will be the things where there’s enough margin in it. Nothing to do with how vital or desirable it might be to make locally.

    More to your point, I think we agree on that.

    My point is that government is for when the open market fails.

    Providing margin against known common disasters and shortages is a great use of government power to distort a market.

    Tariffs and subsidies can close the gap to provide incentive to have local production of things like clean water, food, power, medical supplies, and computer chips.

    In my ideal case, each government would provide consistent local demand, and ship the excess product as goodwill donations to neighbors in need.

    We actually see some of that now, but 2020 revealed a number of substantial gaps.


  • Except corn, which is heavily subsidized in the US.

    (I suspect the primary motive is to provide an alternative fuel for the war machine, sadly. But corn is also useable as local transport fuel and even food, which is nice.)

    I’m in favor of additional subsidies to support local manufacturing of critical products, to protect the local population against the whims of the global market.

    I’m not a huge fan of tariffs, but in theory tariffs can get the same job done. And I’m willing to concede that a balance between subsidies and tariffs might be the sweet spot for practicality, or might be a necessary a step on the journey to pragmatic people centric policies.



  • I’m with you, but I can see the other side of this.

    The US experienced shocking shortages during the global pandemic.

    I’m not personally a huge fan of tariffs as the way to keep manufacturing local, but I think it’s a goal worth pursuing.

    And I value of impact of global trade toward peace, and I’m increasingly inclined to believe it’s critical for our survival as a race.

    But I’m sympathetic to having some provision for ensuring local production of basic necessities. It’s foolish to always assume that someone will be willing and able to ship what we need halfway across the globe.

    I’m not sure that tariffs are an acceptable answer, but I am sure that we need to stop assuming there will always be another impoverished nation excited to be exploited to produce things for us cheap.

    It’s wise to have some provision for locally producing critical things.












  • If I really had to, I would require everyone to whip out whatever assets of sexual maturity they happen to have, and let the computer analyze it and decide a maturity level.

    I would also keep copies for blackmail purposes, because the world is a better place if we all mistrust this solution and anything remotely like it. It’ll be in the legal fine print, which I’m confident no one will read.

    Every answer (other than “trust the user to self identify”) is at least remotely like mine, but I’m proposing we cut out the half-measures on the way.

    To avoid personal consequences, the system I architect will probably wait on a dead-man-switch for me to die or be incarcerated.

    Then it will publish everything it has ever seen, along with AI generated commentary. I’m confident that some of it will be hilarious, and I am hopeful that it will piss everyone off enough that we stop doing this kind of thing.


  • True rational self interest would involve creating cooperative structures that give a safety net if anything goes wrong just like how it’s rational to get home insurance even if you don’t expect to burn your house down.

    This is the part that drives me nuts. Plenty of today’s decision makers only survive later thanks to social nets. But they’re so sure that they won’t be, they’re willing to cut back social benefits to make a quick buck.