His simple framework of “if it’s a bad thing, it’s 10x worse now vs the past so you need me in charge” that he has used forever (including 'American Carnage" in his acceptance speech) really fails when it comes to weather.
First, no normal human is blaming the Biden admin for the strength of hurricanes these days.
Second, if hurricanes are getting worse that implies climate change is real and we need a Democrat in charge to try to stop it.
You’d think their shells would be more sand-colored at birth.
One small uh-oh for a man, one giant extinction event for mankind.
“Nearing toss-up status” aka Trump is still winning above the margin for error. Most likely if Harris wins FL it would be after winning PA, MI, WI, NC, GA, AZ, and thus easily the election.
There are photos and a DNA test that were not shared publicly. It’ll be a good FOIA request in 50 years.
Ironically it’s very specifically weaker, without muscles.
It denotes a change in capitalization from the original.
Flood Insurance Risk Rating 2.0 is kind of sneakily the second best environmental policy Biden got done (after IRA). Actually charging places in flood plains the amount it costs to rebuild, rather than subsidizing it so people repeatedly rebuild in places that flood all the time, will incentivize people slowly to move away from those areas, or at least pay what it costs to live there and know what they’re getting into.
There’s no amendment protecting mini blinds.
More accurately, a vote for Stein is a vote for whichever major party candidate the voter wouldn’t have voted for. In most cases, someone voting for the Green Party would vote for Harris, so it’s a vote for Trump.
That isn’t a moral judgement, it’s the facts of a two party system. -1 vote for Harris = +1 vote for Trump, no other votes matter.
And that’s not telling someone you don’t consider their political beliefs. Considering their political beliefs, they should vote for the major party candidate that they agree with the most, or they will effectively be voting for the one they agree with least.
That’s not the approach with Trump supporters because Trump is the major party candidate they agree with most, by definition. If anything one should try to get Trump supporters to vote 3rd party, Libertarian or for RFK or whoever.
5 day RTO is a stealth layoff. This is a feature, not a bug.
There’s zero evidence that it’s happening “often” so I’m mostly using the space to point out that there’s more to “church” in America than the white evangelical politics-forward churches they see represented on TV. Those pastors are on TV because they are the exception.
Every church I’ve ever been to has been carefully non-partisan on candidates. It’s not just tax status, they don’t want to cause parishioners to feel unwelcome because they need the attendance.
I know some churches are being overly political, sure, but I absolutely believe the majority are doing the right thing.
Churches are social organizing spaces, they have been involved in politics since the very beginning. As long as they are doing it the right way, by encouraging voting but not voting for a particular candidate, and running voter registration drives, driving people to the polls, that’s good. We want more people to vote.
It’s not hypocritical to once be skeptical and then learn that something is OK. That’s called learning.
I blame people for being obtuse when they were complaining with zero evidence that there was a problem, I don’t blame people at all for working legally to increase voting.
She’s obviously Bernie’s heir apparent and will replace him as The Left Wing Democrat to come in 2nd in the primaries now that he’s too old and she’s old enough.
NYC is 7.4% of the US economy. I’m saying that to agree with you, that’s bigger than Florida, bigger than every state other than CA, TX, and (obviously) NY.
Jeb! is a hole in the theory, not every major states governor who is the son of a former president can become president themselves.
Overall kind of a lot of turnover actually…only one Clinton became president, and he was never VP. The other Clinton got beat out by the first black president for the nomination in 08, and then she lost to some guy who had zero political experience.
If anything, we learned that being black doesn’t exclude you from being president, being female doesn’t exclude you from being a major party nominee, and you can still become president even running for office for the first time at age 70. The promise of the statement is more true than ever.
Also I don’t understand this in the context of the post either.
First point “she’s not REALLY an underdog, look at how she polls!”
Every other point “she is polling poorly in key demographics”