@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 3 months agoExperimental Video Game Made Purely With AI Failed Because Tech Was 'Unable to Replace Talent'www.ign.comexternal-linkmessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down123cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1462arrow-down1external-linkExperimental Video Game Made Purely With AI Failed Because Tech Was 'Unable to Replace Talent'www.ign.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square97fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoIts intended use is to replace human work in exchange for lower accuracy. There is no ethical use case scenario.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoIt’s intended to show case its ability to generate text. How people use it is up to them. As I said it’s great for learning as it’s very accurate when summarising articles / docs. It even sources it so you can read up more if needed.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•3 months agoIt’s been known to claim commands and documentation exist when they don’t. It very commonly gets simple addition wrong.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoThat’s because it’s a language processor not a calculator. As I said you’re using it wrong.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoSo the correct usage is to have documents incorrectly explained to you? I fail to see how that does any good.
Its intended use is to replace human work in exchange for lower accuracy. There is no ethical use case scenario.
It’s intended to show case its ability to generate text. How people use it is up to them.
As I said it’s great for learning as it’s very accurate when summarising articles / docs. It even sources it so you can read up more if needed.
It’s been known to claim commands and documentation exist when they don’t. It very commonly gets simple addition wrong.
That’s because it’s a language processor not a calculator. As I said you’re using it wrong.
So the correct usage is to have documents incorrectly explained to you? I fail to see how that does any good.
I know you do buddy.