• sbv
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think they are referring to licensing fees from watch manufacturers.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, why should they need a license fee to use wearOS, which I thought was open source like android?

      • ZickZack@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        exactly: It’s “open source” like android. The core android is open source (in many cases because they are required to), but that does not include anything that makes the actual system work for normal users. The core android is open source (“Android Open Source Project”), but that includes practically nothing: Essentially the stuff that is in there are things that have to be open source (like the linux kernel they use). However, if you want to have the system “practically useable” you need a lot more, which is usually the “Google Mobile Services”, which are proprietary. You are also generally required to install all items in the GMS, i.e. even if you only need the play store, you still have to install google chrome.

        Further, the android name and logo are trademarked by google, so even if you want to roll your own android, you would not be allowed to call it android. WearOS is essentially the same thing: The android subsystem is open, the actual thing you call WearOS (plus trademarks, etc.) are not.