@0x4E4F to [email protected]English • 4 months agoBell curve with no bell curveimagemessage-square80arrow-up1328arrow-down174
arrow-up1254arrow-down1imageBell curve with no bell curve@0x4E4F to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square80
minus-square@0x4E4FOPlinkEnglish1•3 months agoWrong. I don’t use it, thus, don’t actually care for it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•3 months agoI didn’t say all people who don’t use it care about it… Although, it’s funny that the only response is from someone saying they don’t use systemd nor care about it
minus-square@0x4E4FOPlinkEnglish1•3 months agoStill, you said “the only people”… that by itself presumes everyone. And it’s only naturat to get a response from a person that doesn’t use systemd, that’s the taget audience of your comment.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•3 months agoLet’s try this again for the last time: “The only numbers, that are smaller than 10 and also prime numbers, are 2, 3, 5, and 7.” Does this mean that all numbers smaller than 10 are prime numbers?
minus-square@0x4E4FOPlinkEnglish2•3 months agoYou got me there 😂. Still, that phrase when in social context, does usually mean everyone I’m referring to with ”the only" part. Not a native English speaker, but I thought that was the presumption when seing that in that context 🤔.
Wrong. I don’t use it, thus, don’t actually care for it.
I didn’t say all people who don’t use it care about it…
Although, it’s funny that the only response is from someone saying they don’t use systemd nor care about it
Still, you said “the only people”… that by itself presumes everyone.
And it’s only naturat to get a response from a person that doesn’t use systemd, that’s the taget audience of your comment.
Let’s try this again for the last time:
“The only numbers, that are smaller than 10 and also prime numbers, are 2, 3, 5, and 7.”
Does this mean that all numbers smaller than 10 are prime numbers?
You got me there 😂.
Still, that phrase when in social context, does usually mean everyone I’m referring to with ”the only" part.
Not a native English speaker, but I thought that was the presumption when seing that in that context 🤔.