• 𓅂𓄿@c.im
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      @JohnDClay @turkishdelight Zenz repurposes the pro-life argument that reduced birth rates are genocide to make it look like Xinjiang getting free healthcare & women who had 3 kids already receiving tubal ligations/ etc. is genocide the same way KKK guys think modernity is white genocide. China literally trained these people to be bilingual realtors and stuff like that, it wasn’t even a mega trade program or something. They got people to white collar shit Xinjiang is rich

        • 𓅂𓄿@c.im
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          @conditional_soup If you’ve heard of the one child policy here’s a fun fact none of you “China watchers” know. Most regions and/or minority groups did not get affected. If you were Han or anything in Tibet, or a minority any placd, you could be fruitful and multiply. Just an example of how China deliberately gives minority groups boosted democratic representation, healthcare access, training, and cultural representation. Which is what responsible nations should do (glaring at indian res)

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Reading comprehension really is a struggle sometimes. They specifically mentioned scale in their comment. Also, I kinda feel like being open about genocide doesn’t make it better.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They also compared Japanese U.S. internment camps during WWII to the current suppression of Uyghurs in China so maybe take what they say with a grain of salt.

          • JohnDClay
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            You think reeducation camps to kill a culture are different?

              • JohnDClay
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I think the camps for the Uyghurs are.

                Edit: Looks like I got banned for my original comment, so I’ll answer in an edit:

                I think they are comparable in that they are horrible treatment of minorities. I think the concentration camps of Japanese Americans was out of extreme xenophobia. I think the reeducation camps are out desire to stamp out any possibility of independence movements. So not very similar, but both very terrible.

                • nomous@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Do you think the current treatment of Uyghurs by China is comparable to treatment of Japanese people in US internment camps during WWII?

                  • JohnDClay
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I think they are comparable in that they are horrible treatment of minorities. I think the concentration camps of Japanese Americans was out of extreme xenophobia. I think the reeducation camps are out desire to stamp out any possibility of independence movements. So not very similar, but both very terrible.