Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Sunday that he would back age limits for justices, claiming the controversial policy would have helped his own decision-making about his retirement in 2022.

“I don’t think that’s harmful,” he said of Supreme Court terms in an NBC “Meet the Press” interview with Kristen Welker on Sunday. “If you had long terms, for example, they’d have to be long. Why long? Because I don’t think you want someone who’s appointed to the Supreme Court to be thinking about his next job.”

“And so, a 20-year term? I don’t know, 18? Long term? Fine. Fine,” he said. “I don’t think that would be harmful. I think it would have helped, in my case. It would have avoided, for me, going through difficult decisions when you retire. What’s the right time? And so, that would be okay.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    143 months ago

    Need to do that soon. Eventually, people will be able to live to be 100, 150, forever… If we don’t put hard limits in now, we’ll have eternal senators.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      163 months ago

      Eventually, people **WITH MONEY will be able to live to be 100, 150, forever…

      FTFY, and that’s the more scary part.