@[email protected] to [email protected] • 3 months agoMoney has changed microsoftlemmy.worldimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1478arrow-down146
arrow-up1432arrow-down1imageMoney has changed microsoftlemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-square@xlash123link12•3 months agoReally just an English problem. Read it as it is a subsystem by Windows for Linux. But yeah, LSW would’ve been more clear. Plus, it’s almost LSD.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•3 months agoGetting DOS within Linux would be pretty interesting to play with and may get my dad a step closer to abandon windows.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoThere is DOSBox but idk how well that works
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•3 months agoI think it makes more sense to read that it’s a “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•3 months agoMaybe it’s some marketing thing? Like their feature MUST start with Windows™ regardless of getting confusing as hell, it may also help not techie people who make decisions and want to still use a Windows™ solution suggested by a techie
Really just an English problem. Read it as it is a subsystem by Windows for Linux.
But yeah, LSW would’ve been more clear. Plus, it’s almost LSD.
Linux Subsystem for DOS
Getting DOS within Linux would be pretty interesting to play with and may get my dad a step closer to abandon windows.
There is DOSBox but idk how well that works
LSD?
Yea
I think it makes more sense to read that it’s a “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)”.
Maybe it’s some marketing thing? Like their feature MUST start with Windows™ regardless of getting confusing as hell, it may also help not techie people who make decisions and want to still use a Windows™ solution suggested by a techie