It was no April Fool’s joke.

Harry Potter author-turned culture warrior J.K. Rowling kicked off the month with an 11-tweet social media thread in which she argued 10 transgender women were men — and dared Scottish police to arrest her.

Rowling’s intervention came as a controversial new Scottish government law, aimed at protecting minority groups from hate crimes, took effect. And it landed amid a fierce debate over both the legal status of transgender people in Scotland and over what actually constitutes a hate crime.

Already the law has generated far more international buzz than is normal for legislation passed by a small nation’s devolved parliament.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Except they probably don’t even understand the laws. At least the statements she made didn’t actually break the law. She’s either stupid or purposely using a straw man argument.

      So sure. They can stand up for what they believe in. And they can also also get ridiculed for being idiots whose shitty opinions are not based in reality.

      • fuego@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        7 months ago

        for being idiots whose shitty opinions are not based in reality.

        Oh the ironing, lol.

      • fuego@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        7 months ago

        You just don’t like what’s being said so you want to conflate it with trolling.

        • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          No, it’s low-effort rage baiting so I conflate it with trolling. That’s why I said “troll harder” lol

          • fuego@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            7 months ago

            No it’s not.

            You’re just grasping at straws to avoid admitting you’re wrong, now.

            Goodbye. Gonna block you.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                back in my day trolls had to work harder but when mods don’t ban obvious flame attempts they get an easy out :|

    • mindbleach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sometimes what you believe in is inexcusable.

      • fuego@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        This isn’t one of those times.

        To think otherwise is going to make you a lot of enemies by rational people outside these forums.

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you think anti-queer bigotry is excusable, fuck you.

          • fuego@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Why are you mentioning “excusable”?

            We’re literally discussing arresting these people because they disagree with you. Try to stay on topic.

            • mindbleach
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The topic is that their beliefs are actively harmful… which is inexcusable. Do you speak English?