Members of the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol have warned America for three years to take former President Donald Trump at his word.

Now, as Trump is poised to win the Republican presidential nomination, his criminal trials face delays that could stall them past Election Day, and his rhetoric grows increasingly authoritarian, some of those lawmakers find themselves following their own advice.

In mid-March, Trump said on social media that the committee members should be jailed. In December he vowed to be a dictator on “day one.” In August, he said he would “have no choice” but to lock up his political opponents.

“If he intends to eliminate our constitutional system and start arresting his political enemies, I guess I would be on that list,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose). “One thing I did learn on the committee is to pay attention and listen to what Trump says, because he means it.”

Lofgren added that she doesn’t yet have a plan in place to thwart potential retribution by Trump. But Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), who has long been a burr in Trump’s side, said he’s having “real-time conversations” with his staff about how to make sure he stays safe if Trump follows through on his threats.

“We’re taking this seriously, because we have to,” Schiff said. “We’ve seen this movie before … and how perilous it is to ignore what someone is saying when they say they want to be a dictator.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    That’s your view, in my view there should have been more injured cops. What point are you making about comparing the numbers of people in prison? The scale of the two things are not even comparable, there were massive protests in every single state in the country.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            In what way? What even is your point? Your argument is incoherent and exhausting, which is probably your goal anyway.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -33 months ago

              The point is that this is a targeted prosecution, and then you literally showed the gigantic list of people.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                43 months ago

                Yes and? The article was illustrating what convictions people have been receiving. What do you even mean by targeted prosecution?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -23 months ago

                  Targeted as that near thousand or so were being prosecuted for crimes as severe as assault, and then ones as minor as tresspassing, and the people that did no violent act are getting years in prison. Compared to the months of riots and terroizing cities, doing billions of damage, literally overthrowing parts of a city, dozens dead, with millions of people involved, and as far as I am aware LESS people being prosecuted and convicted.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    43 months ago

                    Yes, police rioted and terrorized cities for weeks, police overthrew my neighborhood, who tf are the dozens dead? You are full of shit and trolling, and just incorrect about everything also.