Lanky_Pomegranate530M to [email protected]English • 2 months agoLouisiana High Court: Priests have a "right" not to be sued over decades-old abusewww.friendlyatheist.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1157arrow-down12cross-posted to: politics[email protected]
arrow-up1155arrow-down1external-linkLouisiana High Court: Priests have a "right" not to be sued over decades-old abusewww.friendlyatheist.comLanky_Pomegranate530M to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square25fedilinkcross-posted to: politics[email protected]
minus-squareFuglyDucklinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-22 months agoThere doesn’t appear to be A limitation for sexual assault of children. It might be lumped in with “personal injury” for one year, though. Criminally, it’s 30 years starting when the victim is 18.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoRIP Priests. I think it should definitely be shorter than that though just for practicality’s sake. I didn’t think it’s likely to prove it disprove anything after so much time.
minus-squareFuglyDucklinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoI’m okay if they don’t rest in peace. There’s reasons to extend it, actually. Even if prosecution is harder, victims rarely come forward in otherwise “reasonable” time frames. Especially when the victims are children who may not know what’s happening to them is even wrong.
There doesn’t appear to be A limitation for sexual assault of children. It might be lumped in with “personal injury” for one year, though.
Criminally, it’s 30 years starting when the victim is 18.
RIP Priests.
I think it should definitely be shorter than that though just for practicality’s sake. I didn’t think it’s likely to prove it disprove anything after so much time.
deleted by creator
I’m okay if they don’t rest in peace.
There’s reasons to extend it, actually. Even if prosecution is harder, victims rarely come forward in otherwise “reasonable” time frames.
Especially when the victims are children who may not know what’s happening to them is even wrong.