• IrateAnteater
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Intent is part of the law. Yours was a crime committed with intent, her’s was a crime committed by negligence.

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      So if someone’s intention is to treat depression or cluster headaches the law takes that into consideration? Or not?

      • IrateAnteater
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not arguing the merit of the law itself, I’m just saying that doing something that you know to be against the law is inherently going to generally get you a harsher punishment than causing harm via negligence.

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s generally fair. In this the negligence ended a life though.

          • IrateAnteater
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well yeah. That’s why there’s any legal punishment at all. Being bad at your job otherwise would just get you fired.