@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 3 months ago‘Wake-up call’: pipeline leak exposes carbon capture safety gaps, advocates say | Estimated 2,548 barrels of carbon dioxide leaked from Exxon pipeline in Louisiana on 3 Aprilwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up171arrow-down10cross-posted to: politics[email protected]
arrow-up171arrow-down1external-link‘Wake-up call’: pipeline leak exposes carbon capture safety gaps, advocates say | Estimated 2,548 barrels of carbon dioxide leaked from Exxon pipeline in Louisiana on 3 Aprilwww.theguardian.com@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: politics[email protected]
minus-squareHanrahanlinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoHow mich energy does that take (not the tranport, the liquefying). That HAS to be super inefficient? I know they use it in th O&G industry to extract more O but this is just taking the piss.
minus-squarefederalreverse-oldlinkfedilink3•3 months agoYeah, but you can run the liquefaction on solar, or better yet, excess fossil gas that you’d otherwise have to flare. On the other hand, how else is this supposed to work? Afaik, the stored CO2 is pressurized too.
How mich energy does that take (not the tranport, the liquefying). That HAS to be super inefficient?
I know they use it in th O&G industry to extract more O but this is just taking the piss.
Yeah, but you can run the liquefaction on solar, or better yet, excess fossil gas that you’d otherwise have to flare.
On the other hand, how else is this supposed to work? Afaik, the stored CO2 is pressurized too.