• Sethayy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean me ripping ass is contributing to co2 emissions but it doesnt make coal plants ok cause I fart.

    Bikes have an extremely reduced tire surface area compared to cars as well as much lower velocities; those variables alone causing exponentially less microplastics released.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      And walking causes even less release of microplastics. So if you choose to bike instead of walk, you are responsible for unnecessary microplastics release.

      • Sethayy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Isnt this like the exact opposite of what I was saying?

        Thought I made it pretty clear but I’ll make it even clearer: a human farting does not excuse emissions from coal plants, although they both contribute to greenhouse gasses

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not the opposite. As you said, they both contribute to the problem. But nobody actively encourages farting.

          • Sethayy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Shit to align the metaphor more of farting could replace coal plants, I dont think we’d have people arguing against it though no?

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s hard to find people who still encourage coal plants, especially among environmentalists. But the same is not true of bicycles.