Posting this because I think it’s an interesting examination of the overlap (or lack thereof) between atheists and general skeptics. It’s worth remembering that the term ‘atheism’ only means a rejection of theistic beliefs; non-theistic beliefs that are nonetheless irrational and unsupported by evidence are not relevant to the term. And yet one can easily see why there is an overlap between these two communities and why many atheists scoff at other atheists who profess belief in things like astrology, ghosts, reincarnation, etc.

I’m definitely one of those who doesn’t believe in anything supernatural, but I’ve certainly met atheists who do. It’s worth remembering the two groups aren’t synonymous.

  • Ashyr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Almost certainly the case for the woman in question, I just think Neo-Platonism is fascinating.

    While Neo-Platonism is not directly represented in most Christian teaching, it is very much the lens through which most Christians have read and thought about the Bible for well over a thousand years.

    Ever hear someone explain evil as simply the absence of good? Plotinus.

    The existence of an immortal soul as a spiritual essence distinct from the body? Plotinus

    The idea the spiritual things are good and physical are bad? Plotinus.

    Most Christians accept these ideas all at face value even though they don’t come from the Bible.

    On his podcast, The History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps, professor Peter Adamson notes that Plotinus is probably one of the top 5 most influential minds in Western thought and yet he’s largely unknown.

    Personally, I believe it’s because of how Christian’s glommed onto Greco-Roman thought and incorporated it into their own beliefs.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Got the podcast’s title saved in a notepad file now, and I’ll definitely check it out later. Thanks for the reference.