• PP_GIRL_
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This comment on the original article is almost exactly what I was going to say here

    Whose expectations? Couldn’t have been mine as I expected very few buyers due to the high price and no compelling use case. (Source: sw1tcher)

    Next headline: “People cut back on discretionary spending in the face of rising cost-of-living unaffordability crisis. Sales down for $3,499.99 pair of goggles and caviar.”

    • Bakkoda
      link
      72 months ago

      Apple’s, shareholder’s… Economists doing 8 balls of their secretaries chest. No body sane thought this was gonna sell like hot cakes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        Yeah and to be fair 400-450k is still in the realm of $1.4bn in revenue. That’s pretty good for a new product in year 1 (and presumably the device is at least marginally profitable at the high price - if not it’s a gamble on the future). And sales like that for something that is basically an expensive proof of concept is pretty impressive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          (and presumably the device is at least marginally profitable at the high price

          parts alone, maybe. with R&D factored in, probably not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 months ago

          That’s plan, not actual. I somehow doubt it’ll even reach that level; it’s trying to save face with investors.

          While the tech is impressive, I’m surprised Apple didn’t do enough research beforehand to understand if there’s a market for chunky $3500 computer goggles. None of this is really new tech, and I’m sure the sentiment isn’t hard to find.